Re: [Buzzkill] Cleaning Up Web Audio API Spec

The example apps/spatialization section stuff is on my plate.  If you need
it in the next two weeks, then perhaps Paul should pick it up.

Umm, did I miss a resolution?  The Oscillator definitions are now
mathematical.  I'm not comfortable with that.  Unfortunately, the minutes
of that tc were the ones that were lost.


On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 6:02 AM, kyaw thura maung <tamutharlay@gmail.com>wrote:

> On Dec 3, 2013 6:46 PM, "Olivier Thereaux" <olivier.thereaux@bbc.co.uk>
> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> On 7 Oct 2013, at 22:06, Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org> wrote:
>>
>> > TL;DR: We're publishing the heartbeat draft of the Web Audio API spec
>> as it is this time, but for next publication, we'd like to clean out some
>> of the inappropriate images and references.
>>
>>
>> Getting back to this and looking at what we need to do to get to a state
>> where we can make another official publication of the Web Audio API.
>>
>> 1) ReSpec - Paul has been working on migrating (back) to ReSpec. The
>> draft is at http://padenot.github.io/web-audio-api/ and looks good, as
>> far as I can tell. Only obvious bug seems to be that the numbering of
>> sections has been shifted off by one. Not sure it’s on purpose, or that
>> it’s a good idea.
>>
>> 2) The AudioBuffer Data Races proposal needs to be integrated into the
>> draft. Tracked here: https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/66- assigned to Paul. Paul, what’s the status?
>>
>> 3) Remove the sections we’ve agreed should not be in the spec but in
>> companion documentation. On this Paul wrote:
>> > I'm thinking of removing product names (GarageBand is cited, for
>> > example), company names (EA is cited), and screenshots, basically
>> > cleaning up the section 16, "Example Applications" [0]. In addition,
>> > maybe we could remove the references to other software in section 11,
>> > Spatialization and Panning [1].
>>
>> [0]: http://webaudio.github.io/web-audio-api/#ExampleApplications
>> [1]: http://webaudio.github.io/web-audio-api/#Spatialization-section
>>
>> … possibly we should remove the change log too - mooted by link to github.
>>
>> Paul, is this on your plate too? I’d like to assign an action item for
>> this to be tracked and completed soon.
>>
>> 4) The oscillator/phase pull request has been reviewed and should be
>> merged.
>> https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/pull/270
>>
>> Anything else?
>>
>>
>> --
>> Olivier Thereaux - BBC Internet Research and Future Services
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -----------------------------
>> http://www.bbc.co.uk
>> This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and
>> may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless
>> specifically stated.
>> If you have received it in
>> error, please delete it from your system.
>> Do not use, copy or disclose the
>> information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender
>> immediately.
>> Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails
>> sent or received.
>> Further communication will signify your consent to
>> this.
>> -----------------------------
>>
>>