- From: Paul Adenot <padenot@mozilla.com>
- Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2013 13:29:46 +0100
- To: Olivier Thereaux <olivier.thereaux@bbc.co.uk>, Audio WG <public-audio@w3.org>
- CC: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>, Chris Wilson <cwilso@google.com>
On 03/12/2013 13:14, Olivier Thereaux wrote:> Hello, > > On 7 Oct 2013, at 22:06, Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org> wrote: > >> > TL;DR: We're publishing the heartbeat draft of the Web Audio API spec as it >> > is this time, but for next publication, we'd like to clean out some of the >> > inappropriate images and references. > > Getting back to this and looking at what we need to do to get to a state where > we can make another official publication of the Web Audio API. > > 1) ReSpec - Paul has been working on migrating (back) to ReSpec. The draft is > at http://padenot.github.io/web-audio-api/ and looks good, as far as I can tell. > Only obvious bug seems to be that the numbering of sections has been shifted off > by one. Not sure it’s on purpose, or that it’s a good idea. It's what ReSpec does by default, we can change that if needed. > 2) The AudioBuffer Data Races proposal needs to be integrated into the draft. > Tracked here: https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api/issues/66 - assigned to > Paul. Paul, what’s the status? I've started gathering mailing list discussion, and updating the wiki page roc initialy wrote. I still have to put it in the spec. I hope to have it done by the end of the week. > 3) Remove the sections we’ve agreed should not be in the spec but in companion > documentation. On this Paul wrote: >> > I'm thinking of removing product names (GarageBand is cited, for >> > example), company names (EA is cited), and screenshots, basically >> > cleaning up the section 16, "Example Applications" [0]. In addition, >> > maybe we could remove the references to other software in section 11, >> > Spatialization and Panning [1]. > [0]: http://webaudio.github.io/web-audio-api/#ExampleApplications > [1]: http://webaudio.github.io/web-audio-api/#Spatialization-section > > … possibly we should remove the change log too - mooted by link to github. > > Paul, is this on your plate too? I’d like to assign an action item for this to > be tracked and completed soon. > I can do it if needed, but I have not started doing it. Cheers, Paul.
Received on Tuesday, 3 December 2013 12:30:14 UTC