On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 6:33 PM, Chris Wilson <cwilso@google.com> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 9:11 AM, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>wrote: > >> An audio processing worker would typically have a very small heap so GC >> should have low pause times no matter what. I have always felt that worries >> about GC are just a distraction. >> > > I'm presuming you mean "in the context of Workers, not the main thread." > If so, I agree. > Yeah. Also, by "small heap" I mean a small number of objects and edges in the object graph, which is mainly what matters for GC time. Rob -- Jtehsauts tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy Mdaon yhoaus eanuttehrotraiitny eovni le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.r"t sS?o Whhei csha iids teoa stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d 'mYaonu,r "sGients uapr,e tfaokreg iyvoeunr, 'm aotr atnod sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t" uTph eann dt hwea lmka'n? gBoutt uIp waanndt wyeonut thoo mken.o w * *
Received on Friday, 25 October 2013 16:36:40 UTC