Re: ScriptProcessorNode off the main thread (Was: Questioning the current direction of the Web Audio API) from Chris Wilson on 2013-10-25 (public-audio@w3.org from October to December 2013)

From: Chris Wilson <cwilso@google.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2013 09:33:14 -0700
To: "Robert O'Callahan" <robert@ocallahan.org>
Cc: Marcus Geelnard <mage@opera.com>, Joseph Berkovitz <joe@noteflight.com>, Olivier Thereaux <Olivier.Thereaux@bbc.co.uk>, Audio WG <public-audio@w3.org>, Jussi Kalliokoski <jussi.kalliokoski@gmail.com>, Srikumar Karaikudi Subramanian <srikumarks@gmail.com>, s p <sebpiq@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAJK2wqXMdcg3o+yX=HGibbOVSrrN5Fh_zeJXRBYJt02L0JzHqg@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 9:11 AM, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>wrote:

> An audio processing worker would typically have a very small heap so GC
> should have low pause times no matter what. I have always felt that worries
> about GC are just a distraction.
>

I'm presuming you mean "in the context of Workers, not the main thread."
 If so, I agree.

Received on Friday, 25 October 2013 16:33:41 UTC