On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 5:59 PM, Marcus Geelnard <mage@opera.com> wrote: > I think that it would be good to get some real figures here. For instance, > given the scenario of creating (& destroying) 100 workers per second (given > a more-than-trivial music example, with more-than-trivial per-note graphs), > with >100 workers alive concurrently, what would be the potential overhead > compared to native nodes? (not sure if it's an extreme example - but it's > certainly a probable use case) > Another thing is that it doesn't really make sense to create 1 worker per node. You'd be much better off using a single worker for all nodes on a given page, or at most one worker per CPU core the system has. Rob -- Jtehsauts tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy Mdaon yhoaus eanuttehrotraiitny eovni le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.r"t sS?o Whhei csha iids teoa stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d 'mYaonu,r "sGients uapr,e tfaokreg iyvoeunr, 'm aotr atnod sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t" uTph eann dt hwea lmka'n? gBoutt uIp waanndt wyeonut thoo mken.o w * *
Received on Friday, 25 October 2013 16:35:42 UTC