On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 11:44 AM, Chris Rogers <crogers@google.com> wrote: > I agree with most of this, especially the part about "limiting the scope > of compatibility-affecting changes for the unprefixed AudioContext to those > that are either trivial or essential". The "races" issue for AudioBuffers > I do not agree with. We can't be in a situation where we're > copying-data/duplicating/neutering large PCM data buffers each time we play > a sound. These buffers are often quite large, and it's common to > re-trigger the same sound (from the same buffer) rapidly in succession for > game sound effects, synthesizers, etc. > We're not neutering AudioBuffers --- you can use them over and over again without copying. We're neutering the ArrayBuffers used to create the AudioBuffers. Rob -- Jtehsauts tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy Mdaon yhoaus eanuttehrotraiitny eovni le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.r"t sS?o Whhei csha iids teoa stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d 'mYaonu,r "sGients uapr,e tfaokreg iyvoeunr, 'm aotr atnod sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t" uTph eann dt hwea lmka'n? gBoutt uIp waanndt wyeonut thoo mken.o w
Received on Thursday, 20 June 2013 23:56:10 UTC