Re: Sites using webkitAudioContext only

In the time since you've had an implementation to test against, I've been
very busy with other projects, that's all.  I'm not personally a fan of
"var audioContext = AudioContext || webkitAudioContext" when there's no
AudioContext implementation.


On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 2:25 PM, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>wrote:

> On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 1:54 AM, Olivier Thereaux <
> Olivier.Thereaux@bbc.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> If I can try and summarise some of the mitigating ideas which have been
>> introduced in this thread so far:
>>
>> * Collect and maintain a list of all the significant pieces of
>> documentation of the API
>> * Update HTML5rocks and other documentation which we control directly
>> * Get our community to help us ask implementers and writers to update
>> their examples
>> * Communicate positively about upcoming implementations, make it exciting
>> for developers to update their code
>> * Document known demos and apps using the web audio API as a way to
>> contact them when needed. Also as a way to promote/thanks early adopters?
>> * Publicise (more) aggressively the existence of the Monkey Patch(es)
>>
>
> These are good ideas, but we need people to actually implement them. So
> far, although we've talked about these issues for a long time, even demos
> published by Audio WG members haven't been updated.
>
> Rob
> --
> Jtehsauts tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy Mdaon yhoaus eanuttehrotraiitny eovni le
> atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.r"t sS?o Whhei csha iids teoa
> stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d 'mYaonu,r "sGients uapr,e tfaokreg iyvoeunr, 'm
> aotr atnod sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t" uTph eann dt hwea lmka'n? gBoutt uIp waanndt
> wyeonut thoo mken.o w
>