- From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
- Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 09:25:54 +1200
- To: Olivier Thereaux <Olivier.Thereaux@bbc.co.uk>
- Cc: "public-audio@w3.org" <public-audio@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 18 June 2013 21:26:27 UTC
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 1:54 AM, Olivier Thereaux < Olivier.Thereaux@bbc.co.uk> wrote: > If I can try and summarise some of the mitigating ideas which have been > introduced in this thread so far: > > * Collect and maintain a list of all the significant pieces of > documentation of the API > * Update HTML5rocks and other documentation which we control directly > * Get our community to help us ask implementers and writers to update > their examples > * Communicate positively about upcoming implementations, make it exciting > for developers to update their code > * Document known demos and apps using the web audio API as a way to > contact them when needed. Also as a way to promote/thanks early adopters? > * Publicise (more) aggressively the existence of the Monkey Patch(es) > These are good ideas, but we need people to actually implement them. So far, although we've talked about these issues for a long time, even demos published by Audio WG members haven't been updated. Rob -- Jtehsauts tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy Mdaon yhoaus eanuttehrotraiitny eovni le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.r"t sS?o Whhei csha iids teoa stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d 'mYaonu,r "sGients uapr,e tfaokreg iyvoeunr, 'm aotr atnod sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t" uTph eann dt hwea lmka'n? gBoutt uIp waanndt wyeonut thoo mken.o w
Received on Tuesday, 18 June 2013 21:26:27 UTC