- From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
- Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 09:58:33 +1200
- To: Ehsan Akhgari <ehsan.akhgari@gmail.com>
- Cc: "public-audio@w3.org" <public-audio@w3.org>
Received on Sunday, 12 May 2013 21:59:00 UTC
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 9:20 AM, Ehsan Akhgari <ehsan.akhgari@gmail.com>wrote: > The current WebKit implementation of this node is racy, since the > processing code only protects against simultaneous setting of the curve > property, not against modifying the contents of the ArrayBuffer. > > In the Gecko implementation, I'm just copying the contents of the array > upon setting curve for now, but I think a better fix would be to neuter the > contents of the array, and provide a copy of the original contents of the > array if contents reads the curve property again. > > Does this make sense? > Sounds good to me of course :-) Rob -- q“qIqfq qyqoquq qlqoqvqeq qtqhqoqsqeq qwqhqoq qlqoqvqeq qyqoquq,q qwqhqaqtq qcqrqeqdqiqtq qiqsq qtqhqaqtq qtqoq qyqoquq?q qEqvqeqnq qsqiqnqnqeqrqsq qlqoqvqeq qtqhqoqsqeq qwqhqoq qlqoqvqeq qtqhqeqmq.q qAqnqdq qiqfq qyqoquq qdqoq qgqoqoqdq qtqoq qtqhqoqsqeq qwqhqoq qaqrqeq qgqoqoqdq qtqoq qyqoquq,q qwqhqaqtq qcqrqeqdqiqtq qiqsq qtqhqaqtq qtqoq qyqoquq?q qEqvqeqnq qsqiqnqnqeqrqsq qdqoq qtqhqaqtq.q"
Received on Sunday, 12 May 2013 21:59:00 UTC