- From: Olivier Thereaux <Olivier.Thereaux@bbc.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2013 07:55:29 +0000
- To: "robert@ocallahan.org" <robert@ocallahan.org>, "bugzilla@jessica.w3.org" <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- CC: "public-audio@w3.org" <public-audio@w3.org>
On 03/04/2013 02:21, "Robert O'Callahan" <robert@ocallahan.org> wrote: >Did the group decide that standardizing the HRTF method is unnecessary? >Why? IIRC, there was no consensus one way or another. The question we mostly talked about was how on much information should be added to specify HRTF. There was consensus around the idea that HRTF is a fairly well defined signal processing method, but that an informative pointer to open models could help. Hence the entry in bugzilla. Olivier ----------------------------- http://www.bbc.co.uk This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system. Do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender immediately. Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received. Further communication will signify your consent to this. -----------------------------
Received on Wednesday, 3 April 2013 08:04:12 UTC