W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-audio@w3.org > April to June 2013

Re: [Bug 21550] New: PannerNode - include informative note on HRTF, point to reference/open examples

From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2013 14:33:07 +1300
Message-ID: <CAOp6jLaH5RahfLmgRCHBaqRu7ywVV2sMmMckDTadVx1mrz5eZQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Chris Rogers <crogers@google.com>
Cc: bugzilla@jessica.w3.org, "public-audio@w3.org" <public-audio@w3.org>
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 2:25 PM, Chris Rogers <crogers@google.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 6:21 PM, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>wrote:
>
>> Did the group decide that standardizing the HRTF method is unnecessary?
>> Why?
>>
>
> Chris Lowis of the BBC expressed a preference for leaving this up to the
> implementation.  Chris can chime in here, but I believe he would like to
> avoid locking the spec into something which could be improved as better
> datasets become available.  I'm neutral on the issue.  In any case, I am
> happy to share the dataset used in WebKit.
>

I'm not neutral --- I'm pretty sure we should standardize the HRTF models
so that different implementations sound the same.

New and improved models can be easily added by extending PanningModelType.

Rob
-- 
q“qIqfq qyqoquq qlqoqvqeq qtqhqoqsqeq qwqhqoq qlqoqvqeq qyqoquq,q qwqhqaqtq
qcqrqeqdqiqtq qiqsq qtqhqaqtq qtqoq qyqoquq?q qEqvqeqnq qsqiqnqnqeqrqsq
qlqoqvqeq qtqhqoqsqeq qwqhqoq qlqoqvqeq qtqhqeqmq.q qAqnqdq qiqfq qyqoquq
qdqoq qgqoqoqdq qtqoq qtqhqoqsqeq qwqhqoq qaqrqeq qgqoqoqdq qtqoq qyqoquq,q
qwqhqaqtq qcqrqeqdqiqtq qiqsq qtqhqaqtq qtqoq qyqoquq?q qEqvqeqnq
qsqiqnqnqeqrqsq qdqoq qtqhqaqtq.q
Received on Wednesday, 3 April 2013 01:33:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:03:18 UTC