Re: Vendor implementation status: Web MIDI API

On 22 Nov 2012, at 12:22, Jussi Kalliokoski <jussi.kalliokoski@gmail.com> wrote:
> If the WG is to meet the previously discussed milestones for the Web MIDI API, IMHO we would need at least one implementation to run against the spec to have a clearer map of the problems there might be. 

Yes, and eventually we'd want (at least) 2 proven interoperable implementations.

On a (slightly) off topic note, but nice nevertheless:
How MIDI changed the world of music
	http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-20425376

-- 
Olivier

Received on Wednesday, 28 November 2012 13:39:45 UTC