- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2012 10:04:45 +0000
- To: public-audio@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=19803 Jussi Kalliokoski <jussi.kalliokoski@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.kalliokoski@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Jussi Kalliokoski <jussi.kalliokoski@gmail.com> --- (In reply to comment #0) > The "should" description of fingerprint makes it unreliable, and it is not > clear how it might fail. Yeah, at least AFAICT there's no way of actually guaranteeing that the reliability of the fingerprint. IIRC on Windows XP you don't even have access to the names of USB MIDI devices. And even when you do, it's really hard to determine that if the user has 2 pieces of the same MIDI device, which one is plugged. Hence it's not a hard requirement that the fingerprint stays the same for that certain port, because it might not be possible to achieve, but it's still better than nothing and very useful for example for DAW software, because it can be made to work most of the time. Maybe we should add a note to the spec describing the rationale here? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 1 November 2012 10:04:47 UTC