- From: Colin Clark <colinbdclark@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 12:29:32 -0400
- To: Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org>
- Cc: Mark Boas <markb@happyworm.com>, public-audio@w3.org
Hi Thierry and all, This is a very helpful summary of the status of the Audio WG's working documents. I'm curious if there has been any further discussion of Marcus Geelnard's DSP API proposal amongst the working group? It seemed that there was some consensus that it would be a useful API to provide in order to bridge the gap between the Web Audio API and developers of custom ScriptProcessorNodes, but I haven't heard anything on-list about it in several months. Has any further discussion or work been done on the DSP API? Colin On 2012-10-26, at 6:30 PM, Thierry MICHEL wrote: > Mark, > > Yes, it is exactly what the Audio WG has achieved: > the Web Audio API is a FPWD and Mediastream Processing API is a note. > > Please refer to the wiki page, which lists the document published in public and documents under development. > This wiki page is linked from the Audio WG page. > "A detailed list of this group's publications and their status is available". > > Best, > Thierry. > > http://www.w3.org/2011/audio/wiki/PubStatus#Specifications > > * Web Audio API third WD by Chris Rogers (Google), Web Audio API second WD , Web Audio API first WD. > * MediaStream Processing API WG Note by Robert O'Callahan (Mozilla Corporation), MediaStream Processing API first WD. > * Web MIDI API first WD, by Jussi Kalliokoski and Chris Wilson (Google). > * Web Audio Processing: Use Cases and Requirements first WD, by Joe Berkovitz (Noteflight) and Olivier Thereaux (BBC). > > On 26/10/2012 12:44, Mark Boas wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I remember some months ago this group agreed to push the Web Audio API as a >> standard and to include Mediastream Processing API as a note. >> >> Is there an official page on the audio wg site that states this? I'm not >> having much luck finding one. >> >> Thanks in advance >> >> Mark
Received on Monday, 29 October 2012 16:30:06 UTC