- From: Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2012 23:42:23 +0200
- To: Olivier Thereaux <olivier.thereaux@bbc.co.uk>
- CC: "public-audio@w3.org" <public-audio@w3.org>
Olivier, FYI, I had to agree to add the text 'this is an informative document". see following. thierry. -------- Original Message -------- Message-ID: <506CB09D.3090704@w3.org> Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2012 23:39:41 +0200 From: Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org> Denis, OK, if it is mandatory then please add the text 'this is an informative document" But If that is the case i don't understand why pubrules does not report such issue. Thierry. On 03/10/2012 23:36, Denis Ah-Kang wrote: > On 10/03/2012 05:03 PM, Thierry MICHEL wrote: >> >> >> On 03/10/2012 21:42, Denis Ah-Kang wrote: >>> Hi Thierry, >>> >>> Usually, use cases documents are marked as informative which is not the >>> case here. See [1] for instance. >>> Can you confirm the document is normative? >> >> I don't think it is normative, like any other UC doc. >> But I would not want to change that now, without the WG approval. >> And the document will be published as a Note for a next publication. We >> will update to say informative. > > Thierry, I don't think we can publish this document without the right > patent policy text. Being a normative or informative document has an > impact on IPP. > > Please check with the WG whether or not it is normative. Let me know > if it's informative and I will add the sentence to the document. > > Denis >
Received on Wednesday, 3 October 2012 21:42:43 UTC