Re: Removing the "raises" IDL notations from the spec

On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 9:06 AM, olivier Thereaux <
olivier.thereaux@bbc.co.uk> wrote:

> Hi Ehsan,
>
> I think you should go ahead.
>
> At this point it doesn't look like the web audio API's exceptions are very
> useful/well defined anyway (See e.g.
> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17325) and if indeed
> "raises" has been removed from webIDL, we should remove our instances of it.
>
> Olivier
>

Thanks Ehsan, I agree we should make the spec Web IDL compatible.
 Otherwise, concerning the exceptions, I plan to upgrade the spec to
address issues raised in
17325<https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17325>
.

Chris



>
>
> On 16 Aug 2012, at 03:32, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
>
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I have started to modify the IDL syntax used in the Web Audio spec to
> > be Web IDL compatible.
> >
> > The existing spec uses the "raises" syntax to denote what types of
> > exceptions a given method may throw in a lot of places.  The raises
> > clause has been removed from Web IDL as of September last year, so I'm
> > planning on removing that notation, but I'd like to check here first
> > to make sure nobody objects to this change.  Please let me know if you
> > have concerns about this.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > --
> > Ehsan
> > <http://ehsanakhgari.org/>
> >
>
>