- From: olivier Thereaux <olivier.thereaux@bbc.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 17:06:18 +0100
- To: Ehsan Akhgari <ehsan.akhgari@gmail.com>
- Cc: <public-audio@w3.org>, Chris Rogers <crogers@google.com>
Received on Thursday, 16 August 2012 16:06:43 UTC
Hi Ehsan, I think you should go ahead. At this point it doesn't look like the web audio API's exceptions are very useful/well defined anyway (See e.g. https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17325) and if indeed "raises" has been removed from webIDL, we should remove our instances of it. Olivier On 16 Aug 2012, at 03:32, Ehsan Akhgari wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I have started to modify the IDL syntax used in the Web Audio spec to > be Web IDL compatible. > > The existing spec uses the "raises" syntax to denote what types of > exceptions a given method may throw in a lot of places. The raises > clause has been removed from Web IDL as of September last year, so I'm > planning on removing that notation, but I'd like to check here first > to make sure nobody objects to this change. Please let me know if you > have concerns about this. > > Cheers, > -- > Ehsan > <http://ehsanakhgari.org/> >
Received on Thursday, 16 August 2012 16:06:43 UTC