- From: Chris Wilson <cwilso@google.com>
- Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 16:52:40 -0700
- To: Peter van der Noord <peterdunord@gmail.com>
- Cc: "public-audio@w3.org" <public-audio@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 20 July 2012 23:53:08 UTC
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 4:18 PM, Peter van der Noord <peterdunord@gmail.com>wrote: > Hmm, whether you get the right input/output by providing an id-string or > an index is not the issue, i prefer the id as well. I just think there is a > lack of some core graph-interaction. > Probably true - I think the "derived class nodes" issue and JSNode dynamic number of inputs/outputs should be discussed when Chris is back from vacation. In my opinion it is strange that disconnecting functionality is delivered > only one-way (through outputs). As if i want to remove an element from the > DOM, and the only way to do that is to look in every other element to see > whether it contains the element i want to remove, and then remove it from > the parent. > But that's kinda how it works. If you want to remove a DOM node, you go to its parent and call removeChild( node ) on the parent. :) > Don't get me wrong, i'm not suggesting removing those methods, i am aware > that they are fully necessary for other types of applications than mine. I > was hoping for an addition that could offer those functionalities by other > means as well. > I think they're mostly there, except for needing to build a "composite" node. -C
Received on Friday, 20 July 2012 23:53:08 UTC