- From: Raymond Toy <rtoy@google.com>
- Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 09:44:30 -0700
- To: Jussi Kalliokoski <jussi.kalliokoski@gmail.com>
- Cc: Marcus Geelnard <mage@opera.com>, public-audio@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 19 July 2012 16:44:58 UTC
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 7:11 AM, Jussi Kalliokoski < jussi.kalliokoski@gmail.com> wrote: > > Obviously SIMD code is faster than addition in JS now, for example. And > yes, IIR filter is a type of a convolution, but I don't think it's possible > to write an efficient IIR filter algorithm using a convolution engine — > after all, a convolution engine should be designed to deal with a FIRs. Not > to mention that common IIR filters have 4 (LP, HP, BP, N) kernels, which > would be really inefficient for a FastConvolution algorithm, even if it > supported FIR. And as far as IIR filter performance goes, I think SIMD > instructions offer very little usefulness in IIR algorithms, since they're > so linear. > > https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75528 says that adding SIMD gives a 45% improvement. Ray
Received on Thursday, 19 July 2012 16:44:58 UTC