[Bug 17795] Behavior of multiple connections to same node needs to be explicitly defined

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17795

--- Comment #6 from Chris Wilson <cwilso@gmail.com> 2012-07-19 16:48:51 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Depends on your point of view I guess. In this case I think the author would
> expect connect() to cause a change in the output, and it won't.

I guess I translate connect() as "make sure these nodes are connected".  I see
the model you're describing, and it's consistent; I think we just need to
choose the simplicity of the model (no identifiers) vs the utility of multiple
connections between node i/o points.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.

Received on Thursday, 19 July 2012 16:48:53 UTC