Re: properties for exposing custom Braille descriptions

Hi, Dominic, All:

Just a quick note that there's a new Task Force on Pronunciation
starting up in the Accessible Platform Architectures WG:


https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/task-forces/pronunciation/work-statement


hth

Janina

Dominic Mazzoni writes:
> I love this idea. Some questions:
> 
> Can we apply this to every ARIA property that exposes localizable text and
> not just aria-label and aria-roledescription? I think aria-valuetext and
> aria-placeholder are the other two that would make sense.
> 
> Perhaps we should explicitly include attributes for speech, as well as
> braille? I don't think we want authors to be making the assumption that
> aria-label is used for speech by default, even though that's the most
> widely-used application of it today. Aria-label could be used for voice
> control, the string that somebody should speak in order to activate a
> control. So I'd propose something like <button aria-label="Call an Uber"
> aria-labelspeech="Call an Oober" aria-labelbraille="⣏⣹"> - in other words,
> aria-label should be the default string that could be shown visually or
> when spelled out, aria-labelspeech is a pronunciation hint, and
> aria-labelbraille is a braille hint.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 7:18 AM White, Jason J <jjwhite@ets.org> wrote:
> 
> > The Unicode braille is also correctly displayed via JAWS and NVDA even
> > with Grade II translation enabled. I haven't yet tested Chrome OS/ChromeVox
> > or iOS/Voiceover, and I don't currently have access to an Android device
> > with BrailleBack or BRLTTY installed. Although I can access a device with
> > Amazon's VoiceView, I don't possess a supported braille display (it works
> > with HumanWare and Baum protocols only - and my Baum display from circa
> > 2005 appears to have hardware problems).
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: White, Jason J <jjwhite@ets.org>
> > Sent: Thursday, February 7, 2019 2:06 PM
> > To: Joanmarie Diggs <jdiggs@igalia.com>; Peter Krautzberger <
> > peter@krautzource.com>
> > Cc: public-aria@w3.org
> > Subject: Re: properties for exposing custom Braille descriptions
> >
> > I wrote the Python code below to create Unicode braille files from arrays
> > of integers representing cell contents. I then created a file and accessed
> > it in gedit with Orca.
> >
> > The Unicode characters (encoded as utf-8) were correctly displayed, even
> > though UEB translation was enabled. The speech output also announced the
> > dot patterns for each character.
> >
> > On the Mac, I had to turn off contracted braille (i.e., Grade II
> > translation) to display the Unicode characters.
> >
> >
> > # Convert braille cell dot specifications to Unicode braille.
> > def cellToUnicode(cell):
> >     """Convert an array of integers (1-8) denoting dots to the
> > corresponding
> >     Unicode braille code point."""
> >     dots=0x2800
> >     if len(cell) > 8:
> >         raise ValueError("Cell too large:", len(cell))
> >     for dot in cell:
> >         if dot < 1 or dot > 8:
> >             raise ValueError("Dot out of range", dot)
> >         dots |= 1 << (dot-1)
> >     return chr(dots)
> >
> > def cellsToBraille(cells):
> >     """Convert an array of cells to a UTF-8 braille Unicode string."""
> >     output=""
> >     for cell in cells:
> >         output += cellToUnicode(cell)
> >     return output.encode('utf-8')
> >
> > def writeUnicodeBraille(filename, cells):
> >     """Write the specified cells as Unicode braille to the file given."""
> >     output=cellsToBraille(cells)
> >     with open(filename, 'wb') as outputFile:
> >         outputFile.write(output)
> >
> >
> > On 2/7/19, 12:13, "Joanmarie Diggs" <jdiggs@igalia.com> wrote:
> >
> >     Thanks Jason!
> >
> >     We don't need a page per se. It should be sufficient to put some
> > braille
> >     unicode characters in a text editor like gedit or notepad.
> >
> >     --joanie
> >
> >     On 2/7/19 12:07 PM, White, Jason J wrote:
> >     > I can perform the test on multiple platforms, including
> > Linux/GNOME/Orca. Is there a test page already, or should I create one?
> >     >
> >     > On 2/7/19, 12:00, "Joanmarie Diggs" <jdiggs@igalia.com> wrote:
> >     >
> >     >     Indeed, for translation. But Unicode braille characters
> > shouldn't be
> >     >     translated. So one question is: Is liblouis smart enough to not
> >     >     translate those? The second question is: Is the library used to
> >     >     communicate with the display (in my case that would be BrlTTY)
> > smart
> >     >     enough to handle those characters?
> >     >
> >     >     I would hope that the answer to both questions is "yes." And I
> > went to
> >     >     verify that this morning for my platform, but when I powered on
> > my
> >     >     ancient braille display, it made all sorts of noises and gave up
> > the
> >     >     ghost. :(
> >     >
> >     >     A quick test I did suggests liblouis *might* be translating those
> >     >     characters, but I'm not positive. Since you (Jason) happen to
> > use Orca,
> >     >     and presumably have a not-dead refreshable braille display,
> > could you
> >     >     please do the test for me to answer both the first question and
> > the
> >     >     second question?
> >     >
> >     >     You should be able to answer the second question by disabling
> >     >     translated/contracted braille. That will cause Orca to send the
> >     >     characters directly to BrlTTY unmodified. If what's on the
> > display
> >     >     matches the unicode braille dot patterns in the test text, then
> > we know
> >     >     BrlTTY is good.
> >     >
> >     >     To answer the first question, re-enable translated/contracted
> > braille.
> >     >     If those unicode braille dot patterns are still preserved, then
> > liblouis
> >     >     is also good. If liblouis isn't good, we should fix that in
> > liblouis,
> >     >     but that's something I can work around in Orca by looking for
> > characters
> >     >     in the braille dot pattern range and not sending them to
> > liblouis. As
> >     >     far as I am aware, I don't have control over what BrlTTY does
> > with the
> >     >     characters I give it.
> >     >
> >     >     Thanks in advance for doing these tests. And sorry for having to
> > ask
> >     >     you. My braille display picked a fine morning to kick the bucket.
> >     >
> >     >     --joanie
> >     >
> >     >
> >     >     On 2/7/19 9:06 AM, White, Jason J wrote:
> >     >     > Besides Apple, I think everyone is using liblouis at this
> > point for translation. I don't know what Apple's Mac OS and iOS
> > implementations use. I think it would be reasonable to expect everyone to
> > support the Unicode code points for braille rendering.
> >     >     >
> >     >     > On 2/7/19, 09:04, "Joanmarie Diggs" <jdiggs@igalia.com> wrote:
> >     >     >
> >     >     >     Do we know if all the braille libraries used by the
> > platforms support
> >     >     >     Unicode block?
> >     >     >
> >     >     >     On 2/7/19 8:57 AM, White, Jason J wrote:
> >     >     >     > Braille ASCII varies between countries, hence between
> > the braille tables
> >     >     >     > loaded by screen readers – so it can’t be used to
> > specify a desired
> >     >     >     > braille representation reliably.
> >     >     >     >
> >     >     >     >
> >     >     >     >
> >     >     >     > For example, if the author assumes North American ASCII
> > braille, but the
> >     >     >     > user’s system is configured for one of the European
> > codes, the result
> >     >     >     > won’t be what the author would expect.
> >     >     >     >
> >     >     >     >
> >     >     >     >
> >     >     >     > Only the Unicode block is unambiguous.
> >     >     >     >
> >     >     >     >
> >     >     >     >
> >     >     >     >
> >     >     >     >
> >     >     >     > *From: *Peter Krautzberger <peter@krautzource.com>
> >     >     >     > *Date: *Thursday, February 7, 2019 at 08:43
> >     >     >     > *To: *"White, Jason J" <jjwhite@ets.org>
> >     >     >     > *Cc: *"public-aria@w3.org" <public-aria@w3.org>
> >     >     >     > *Subject: *Re: properties for exposing custom Braille
> > descriptions
> >     >     >     >
> >     >     >     >
> >     >     >     >
> >     >     >     > Hi Jason,
> >     >     >     >
> >     >     >     >
> >     >     >     >
> >     >     >     > This question is mentiond in the list of questions at
> > the end of the
> >     >     >     > page. My apologies if the page was not accessible enough
> > to make it there.
> >     >     >     >
> >     >     >     >
> >     >     >     >
> >     >     >     > Speaking for myself, I'd very much hope that Unicode
> > Braille would work.
> >     >     >     > But Braille ascii might be a useful consideration. As I
> > understand it,
> >     >     >     > NVDA's prototype back in May pushed the raw value out
> > (and Sina's test
> >     >     >     > files used grade 1).
> >     >     >     >
> >     >     >     >
> >     >     >     >
> >     >     >     > Best regards,
> >     >     >     >
> >     >     >     > Peter.
> >     >     >     >
> >     >     >     >
> >     >     >     >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >     >     >     >
> >     >     >     > This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may
> > contain privileged or
> >     >     >     > confidential information. It is solely for use by the
> > individual for
> >     >     >     > whom it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If
> > you received this
> >     >     >     > e-mail in error, please notify the sender; do not
> > disclose, copy,
> >     >     >     > distribute, or take any action in reliance on the
> > contents of this
> >     >     >     > information; and delete it from your system. Any other
> > use of this
> >     >     >     > e-mail is prohibited.
> >     >     >     >
> >     >     >     >
> >     >     >     > Thank you for your compliance.
> >     >     >     >
> >     >     >     >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >     >     >
> >     >     >
> >     >     >
> >     >     >
> >     >     > ________________________________
> >     >     >
> >     >     > This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain
> > privileged or confidential information. It is solely for use by the
> > individual for whom it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you
> > received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose,
> > copy, distribute, or take any action in reliance on the contents of this
> > information; and delete it from your system. Any other use of this e-mail
> > is prohibited.
> >     >     >
> >     >     >
> >     >     > Thank you for your compliance.
> >     >     >
> >     >     > ________________________________
> >     >     >
> >     >
> >     >
> >     >
> >     >
> >     > ________________________________
> >     >
> >     > This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged
> > or confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for
> > whom it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this
> > e-mail in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy,
> > distribute, or take any action in reliance on the contents of this
> > information; and delete it from your system. Any other use of this e-mail
> > is prohibited.
> >     >
> >     >
> >     > Thank you for your compliance.
> >     >
> >     > ________________________________
> >     >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> >
> > This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or
> > confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for whom
> > it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this e-mail
> > in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, distribute, or
> > take any action in reliance on the contents of this information; and delete
> > it from your system. Any other use of this e-mail is prohibited.
> >
> >
> > Thank you for your compliance.
> >
> > ________________________________
> >
> > ________________________________
> >
> > This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or
> > confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for whom
> > it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this e-mail
> > in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, distribute, or
> > take any action in reliance on the contents of this information; and delete
> > it from your system. Any other use of this e-mail is prohibited.
> >
> >
> > Thank you for your compliance.
> >
> > ________________________________
> >

-- 

Janina Sajka

Linux Foundation Fellow
Executive Chair, Accessibility Workgroup: http://a11y.org

The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI)
Chair, Accessible Platform Architectures http://www.w3.org/wai/apa

Received on Friday, 8 February 2019 17:22:28 UTC