Re: CfC: Standing consent to publish updated Working Drafts

I support this proposal if each WD will include a changelog, to make it 
easy for people to discover what has changed since the last WD was 
published. If this is not the intention, I object to this proposal.



On 14/09/2018 19:00, Janina Sajka wrote:
> +1
> 
> Janina
> 
> Joanmarie Diggs writes:
>> This is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to the ARIA Working Group to provide
>> standing consent to publish updated Working Drafts of all
>> Recommendation-track and Note-track documents maintained by the ARIA
>> Working Group. If this CfC is accepted, the Working Group will not need
>> to provide consent to publish each Working Draft, and the outcome of
>> this CfC will be used as the decision of record for publication of
>> drafts as needed. This applies only to ordinary Working Drafts, not
>> other stages which require formal transitions including First Public
>> Working Draft, Candidate Recommendation, and later stages.
>>
>> Action
>>
>> This CfC is now open for objection, comment, as well as statements of
>> support via email. Silence will be interpreted as support, though
>> messages of support are certainly welcome.
>>
>> If you object to this proposal, or have comments concerning it, please
>> respond by replying on list to this message no later than 12:00 Boston
>> Time, Thursday, 20 September 2018.
>>
>> For objections only, please copy the main public-aria@w3.org list to
>> allow technical discussion of the objection to happen there.
>>
>> Process
>>
>> This CfC is conducted per the ARIA WG decision policy:
>> https://www.w3.org/WAI/ARIA/decision-policy
> 

-- 
@LeonieWatson @tink@toot.cafe Carpe diem

Received on Friday, 14 September 2018 20:06:08 UTC