- From: Bryan Garaventa <bryan.garaventa@levelaccess.com>
- Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2018 17:00:08 +0000
- To: Joanmarie Diggs <jdiggs@igalia.com>, Carolyn MacLeod <Carolyn_MacLeod@ca.ibm.com>
- CC: "nurthen@adobe.com" <nurthen@adobe.com>, "public-aria@w3.org" <public-aria@w3.org>
For the markup, <label for="test">foo <input id="test" type="button" name="test" title="bar"> baz</label> I have the result for accName: "foo baz" accDesc: "bar" (Running AccName Computation Prototype version: 2.16) There was a bug in that processing which I fixed a few minutes ago, but title shouldn't be processed on subnodes of a tree and added to name. Bryan Garaventa Accessibility Fellow Level Access, Inc. Bryan.Garaventa@LevelAccess.com 415.624.2709 (o) www.LevelAccess.com -----Original Message----- From: Joanmarie Diggs <jdiggs@igalia.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2018 3:10 PM To: Carolyn MacLeod <Carolyn_MacLeod@ca.ibm.com> Cc: Bryan Garaventa <bryan.garaventa@levelaccess.com>; nurthen@adobe.com; public-aria@w3.org Subject: Re: AccName test expectations bug + prototype bug? On 09/12/2018 05:39 PM, Carolyn MacLeod wrote: > The 2 spaces is for your simpler variant: > <label for="test">foo <input id="test" type="button" name="test" > title="bar"> baz</label> Right. Though whether or not it should be is, I think, up to the HTML-AAM. What implementors are actually doing is another question, but, again, I believe what they do is simplify/collapse whitespace. > As for the CSS ::before and ::after content in test case 661 > <https://www.w3.org/wiki/AccName_1.1_Testable_Statements#Name_test_cas > e_661>, I guess the accessible name would be "foobaz" (no space?) Another question for the group. My guess is that we (the group) assume it should be "foo baz", but what's in AccName step 2.F.ii suggests to me that the space wouldn't be there. Thursday's going to be a fun meeting. I can tell. :) > and the > accessible description would be " bar " (with space before and > after?), except that I'm not really sure about those. Me neither. Another topic for Thursday I guess. --joanie
Received on Thursday, 13 September 2018 17:00:41 UTC