- From: Ku, Jaeun <jku@illinois.edu>
- Date: Thu, 24 May 2018 18:09:40 +0000
- To: James Nurthen <nurthen@adobe.com>, ARIA Working Group <public-aria@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <ACF35B439B891E408A70DF1C1D1D0F1B39809331@CITESMBX6.ad.uillinois.edu>
Here the meeting minutes from today’s ARIA meeting https://www.w3.org/2018/05/24-aria-minutes.html Thanks, Jemma Accessible Rich Internet Applications Working Group Teleconference 24 May 2018 Attendees Present Irfan_Ali, jamesn, jemma, janina, melanierichards, jongund, matt-king Regrets tzviya Chair SV_MEETING_CHAIR Scribe jemma Contents * Topics<https://www.w3.org/2018/05/24-aria-minutes.html#agenda> 1. TPAC 2018 update (1 min)<https://www.w3.org/2018/05/24-aria-minutes.html#item01> 2. IDL Reflections branch update (1 min)<https://www.w3.org/2018/05/24-aria-minutes.html#item02> 3. Annotations<https://www.w3.org/2018/05/24-aria-minutes.html#item03> 4. Open PRs<https://www.w3.org/2018/05/24-aria-minutes.html#item04> * Summary of Action Items<https://www.w3.org/2018/05/24-aria-minutes.html#ActionSummary> * Summary of Resolutions<https://www.w3.org/2018/05/24-aria-minutes.html#ResolutionSummary> ________________________________ scribe+ Jemma TPAC 2018 update (1 min) <jamesn> scribe: jemma thrusday and friday will be the meeting dates for the group. IDL Reflections branch update (1 min) any comments for IDL? matt: should we have at least one APG example? james: not sure yet. but we will have some code to test. ... browsers still use old codes jamesn: it is different procedure, so it is hard to gauge example this time. matt: may we need to revisit the decision? jamesn: we had a merge decision but we can talk next week as an agenda item Annotations aaron: summary of last week's meeting <jamesn> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-aria/2018May/0061.html <jamesn> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-aria/2018May/0056.html aaron: user needs to know aria detail and role relationship with this suggestion ... Use aria-details + optional aria-detailstype on the same element with one > of the following values: > > assessing, classifying, commenting, describing (default), editing, > highlighting, identifying, linking, moderating, questioning, replying, > tagging ... explain specific use cases with proposal <jamesn> latest proposal is here https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-aria/2018May/att-0062/aria-detailstype.html aaron: we can create new value for motivations for example mealanie: wondering whether there is a way that we can collect all the use cases in one place, excel sheet aaron: use cases I am suggesting are basically similar to MS except a few things melanie: I have some questions about a few specifics aaron: additional info can be span of content <timCole> http://w3c.github.io/dpub-annotation/ tim: this has some use cases ... ie. motivation is high level of spec, which can be started from arron: my concern is that we would not be able to figure out all the semantic details. ... people may be expect that every detail will be mapped out - no flexibility melanie: rather than each detailed use case, call for (general)use case will be needed? matt: ie. aria detail goes on figure and points to the element which detained description ... s/detained/detailed ... token value can be different, in other words, I have concern about DOM, language of token <janina> +1 to Matt. I'm wondering whether we need grammatical gerunds, e.g. "commenting" as opposed to "comment" aaron: I am not sure whether I can suggest all the details to the screen readers but I would like to put emphasis on semantics. matt: I hear you james: re: browser display jame: another issue is current aria1.2 scope, focus on 'role parity' s/arial/aria matt: wonder the screen users' navigation capability - what if the screen reader users cannot go back nor keyboard functionality. aaron: that will be up to author, who ensures graceful degradation ... I hope annotation and detail can be inline so everything can reviewed at once. matt: if we add this to aria 1.2, APG group want support to implement this. aaron: I can support and help creating the example in ARIA APG jongund: aria details in on AAM, <jamesn> https://github.com/w3c/aria/issues/458 aria detail property does not have any mapping in accessibility API jongund: aria detail property does not have any mapping in accessibility API jamesn: this is the decision, https://github.com/w3c/aria/issues/458 matt: does this create the link between the spec(dependency)? ... I would rather have to token, like "has-comment" rather than using nouns, comment or commenting mealnie: I agree with Matt. after I talked to web group jongund: if there is another thing in spec, aria described why we create new one? aaron: ie. breakpoint, aria details can have either one or both with condition and without james: it does not sound right. matt: I agree with james aaron: do you like details type as name? matt: I like it james: I am good with that jongund: ok with me aaron: can any one help with use case? mealanie: I can help jamesn: please copy the content to the list timcole: I can also help with use case Open PRs <jamesn> https://github.com/w3c/aria/pull/766 <jamesn> https://github.com/w3c/aria/commit/281b54fe6b12d762064abb1976eb0f32523c7ef0 jamesn: it is editorial issue. I need confirmation on that matt: I agree jamesn: if the group is ok, I will modify james: please leave comment if you have suggestion Summary of Action Items Summary of Resolutions From: James Nurthen <nurthen@adobe.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2018 6:42 PM To: ARIA Working Group <public-aria@w3.org> Subject: Agenda for Thursday 24 May, 2018 - ARIA Working Group Meeting: WAI-ARIA Working Group – 24 May 2018 Time: 10:00 AM US Pacific, 1:00 PM US Eastern Duration: 1 hour Webex: https://www.w3.org/2017/08/telecon-info_aria<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2017%2F08%2Ftelecon-info_aria&data=02%7C01%7Ciali%40ets.org%7C65626730866f40bcebd508d5bafef263%7C0ba6e9b760b34fae92f37e6ddd9e9b65%7C0%7C0%7C636620526509161365&sdata=wr5t2kJnN35YvJSbNtWEMpDjpp6oGtusrZfWUlQYEfU%3D&reserved=0> IRC: irc.w3.org, port: 6665, channel: #aria Agenda: 1. TPAC 2018 update (1 min) 2. IDL Reflections branch update (1 min) 3. Annotations (20 min) * https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-aria/2018May/0062.html 4. Open PRs (20 min) * https://github.com/w3c/aria/pull/766 * https://github.com/w3c/aria/pull/761 * https://github.com/w3c/aria/pull/511 5. Issues with no milestone triage * https://github.com/w3c/aria/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+no%3Amilestone+sort%3Acreated-asc Time: https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=WAI-ARIA+Working+Group+Meeting&iso=20180524T13&p1=43&ah=1 Decision Policy: https://www.w3.org/WAI/ARIA/decision-policy<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FWAI%2FARIA%2Fdecision-policy&data=02%7C01%7Ciali%40ets.org%7C65626730866f40bcebd508d5bafef263%7C0ba6e9b760b34fae92f37e6ddd9e9b65%7C0%7C0%7C636620526509161365&sdata=%2F%2BsoEzVvwN6VDOEGbzD6rOYauljBM6BO3NIAc2lSHps%3D&reserved=0> Minutes Last Meeting: https://www.w3.org/2018/05/17-aria-minutes.html
Received on Thursday, 24 May 2018 18:10:14 UTC