- From: Schnabel, Stefan <stefan.schnabel@sap.com>
- Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 17:58:33 +0000
- To: Matt King <a11ythinker@gmail.com>
- CC: Bryan Garaventa <bryan.garaventa@levelaccess.com>, ARIA Working Group <public-aria@w3.org>
We have that state for checkboxes in business apps, too. Others too, such as invalid. Regards Stefan Sent from my iPad > On 18. Sep 2017, at 04:00, Matt King <a11ythinker@gmail.com> wrote: > > That seems valid to me. Worth raising an issue. > > Matt > > -----Original Message----- > From: Bryan Garaventa [mailto:bryan.garaventa@levelaccess.com] > Sent: Friday, September 15, 2017 7:26 PM > To: ARIA Working Group <public-aria@w3.org> > Subject: Logic behind aria-required not being valid on role=checkbox? > > Hi, > Somebody brought a use case to my attention today regarding the use of > aria-required and role=checkbox, and it seems like a valid one, however > aria-required doesn't appear to be supported on role=checkbox. > > The use case being that of a License Agreement checkbox where, if the > checkbox is not checked then the form will not submit, so technically > interacting with the checkbox is required to proceed. > > Would there be any interest in adding aria-required as a supported attribute > of role=checkbox in this case? > > Bryan Garaventa > Accessibility Fellow > Level Access, Inc. > Bryan.Garaventa@LevelAccess.com > 415.624.2709 (o) > www.LevelAccess.com > > > >
Received on Monday, 18 September 2017 17:58:58 UTC