W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-aria@w3.org > September 2017

RE: Draft Practices Task Force work statement

From: Matt King <a11ythinker@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2017 09:42:42 -0700
To: "'White, Jason J'" <jjwhite@ets.org>, "'Michael Cooper'" <cooper@w3.org>, "'ARIA Working Group'" <public-aria@w3.org>
Message-ID: <030d01d327f8$54126260$fc372720$@gmail.com>
Yes, Jason, we will continue to use a mailing list to solicit and receive feedback. Although, we do prefer to receive feedback in GitHub issues whenever possible.

Matt

-----Original Message-----
From: White, Jason J [mailto:jjwhite@ets.org] 
Sent: Thursday, September 7, 2017 6:31 AM
To: Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org>; ARIA Working Group <public-aria@w3.org>
Subject: RE: Draft Practices Task Force work statement

Thank you, Michael, for formalizing the Authoring Practices work.

I find it useful to be able to comment on Authoring Practices examples via the mailing list without having to make the commitment that would be required to participate in a Task Force. Do you expect such review (by participants in the larger ARIA WG early in the process of developing code examples) to continue to be possible under the proposed new arrangements?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Cooper [mailto:cooper@w3.org]
> Sent: Thursday, September 7, 2017 9:05 AM
> To: ARIA Working Group <public-aria@w3.org>
> Subject: Draft Practices Task Force work statement
>
> For some years we have had a sub-group working to develop WAI-ARIA 
> Authoring Practices. Although it operates like a task force, we never 
> formalized that, meaning there are certain task force supports the 
> group has not been using. We thought it might be time to formalize the 
> group, so I have drafted a work statement for a Practices Task Force:
>
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.
> org%2FWAI%2FARIA%2Ftask-forces%2Fpractices%2Fwork-
> statement&data=02%7C01%7Cjjwhite%40ets.org%7Cd60b60cda24c4c7c74c508
> d4f5f11ead%7C0ba6e9b760b34fae92f37e6ddd9e9b65%7C0%7C0%7C63640386
> 3339398167&sdata=eYBAoEHWBXnpQjj9jKVvAsyT65%2BiRhkXBlpldZ8rub8%3D&
> reserved=0
>
> If accepted, I don't expect much impact on the actual work mechanism, 
> but there would be some better integration with other processes we use.
>
> Michael
>


________________________________

This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for whom it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, distribute, or take any action in reliance on the contents of this information; and delete it from your system. Any other use of this e-mail is prohibited.


Thank you for your compliance.

________________________________
Received on Thursday, 7 September 2017 16:43:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 7 September 2017 16:43:13 UTC