- From: Léonie Watson <tink@tink.uk>
- Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2017 14:15:52 +0100
- To: Joanmarie Diggs <jdiggs@igalia.com>
- Cc: ARIA Working Group <public-aria@w3.org>
Thanks Joanie. Michiel did review it on behalf of APA. If you're happy for that review to act as ARIA WG's review too (which probably makes sense), that's fine from WebPlat's point of view. On 26/07/2017 11:55, Joanmarie Diggs wrote: > Hey Léonie. > > I myself continue to be heads-down on ARIA 1.1 testing and bug fixing, > but if memory serves me Michiel went over that spec. Regardless, I'll > add it to tomorrow's meeting agenda. > > Sorry and thanks for the ping! > --joanie > > On 07/26/2017 12:20 AM, Léonie Watson wrote: >> Joannie & Rich, >> >> The Web Plat WG requested a review of ARIA in HTML back in January [1]. >> We don't seem to have received any comments from the ARIA WG, but in >> case we've missed them and/or there were none, could you confirm? >> >> Thanks >> Léonie. >> [1] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-aria/2016Nov/0024.html >> > -- @LeonieWatson @tink@toot.cafe tink.uk Carpe diem
Received on Wednesday, 26 July 2017 13:16:20 UTC