Re: APA review of ARIA in HTML

Hi, All:

I'm responding only to add the ARIA-WG as a cc. As I recall, we
coordinated our reviews, so we should keep both groups in this follow up
conversation.

Janina

Michiel Bijl writes:
> Léonie, Janina,
> 
> The issues that came out of the review have been logged against the HTML spec [1] as requested by Steve.
> 
> There’s also an issue filed against ARIA in HTML [2] as a result of the review.
> 
> — Michiel
> 
> [1]: https://github.com/w3c/html/issues/894
> [2]: https://github.com/w3c/using-aria/issues/26
> 
> > On 25 Jul 2017, at 23:13, Léonie Watson <tink@tink.uk> wrote:
> > 
> > Janina,
> > 
> > APA was kind enough to review the ARIA in HTML spec a few months ago [1]. Michiel had an action to file issues against the ARIA in HTML specification and the action has been closed), but there don't seem to be any issues filed on the ARIA in HTML repo.
> > 
> > Can you advise? Thanks.
> > 
> > Léonie.
> > [1] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-apa/2017Jan/0023.html
> > [2] https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/actions/2109
> > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > @LeonieWatson @tink@toot.cafe tink.uk Carpe diem
> > 

-- 

Janina Sajka, Phone: +1.443.300.2200
   sip:janina@asterisk.rednote.net
  Email: janina@rednote.net

Linux Foundation Fellow
Executive Chair, Accessibility Workgroup: http://a11y.org

The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI)
Chair, Accessible Platform Architectures http://www.w3.org/wai/apa

Received on Wednesday, 26 July 2017 12:47:18 UTC