- From: Bryan Garaventa <bryan.garaventa@levelaccess.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2017 17:03:57 +0000
- To: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
- CC: ARIA Working Group <public-aria@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <BN6PR03MB2785E2739507D296AE3CD9DDF2840@BN6PR03MB2785.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Thanks, that’s what I thought as well. I can’t find anything in the spec that says this however, which makes it difficult for me to enter bugs against it. Bryan Garaventa Accessibility Fellow Level Access, Inc. Bryan.Garaventa@LevelAccess.com 415.624.2709 (o) www.LevelAccess.com From: Steve Faulkner [mailto:faulkner.steve@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, August 19, 2017 12:57 AM To: Bryan Garaventa <bryan.garaventa@levelaccess.com> Cc: ARIA Working Group <public-aria@w3.org> Subject: Re: Clarification regarding live regions and hidden elements If an element is meant to be explicitly hidden, should it remain an active live region regardless? I don't believe it should, but this does not mean that its contents cannot be referenced via aria-labelledby/describedby when hidden. -- Regards SteveF Current Standards Work @W3C<http://www.paciellogroup.com/blog/2015/03/current-standards-work-at-w3c/> On 19 August 2017 at 00:25, Bryan Garaventa <bryan.garaventa@levelaccess.com<mailto:bryan.garaventa@levelaccess.com>> wrote: Hi, Today I was asked whether live regions are allowed on hidden elements, and I thought this was a simple no, but in looking at the spec and testing, it appears people's understanding of this is all over the map. E.G An element like a div that includes CSS display:none or visibility:hidden, or the HTML5 hidden attribute, or even aria-hidden="true". If an element is meant to be explicitly hidden, should it remain an active live region regardless? Thanks, Bryan Bryan Garaventa Accessibility Fellow Level Access, Inc. Bryan.Garaventa@LevelAccess.com<mailto:Bryan.Garaventa@LevelAccess.com> 415.624.2709 (o) www.LevelAccess.com<http://www.LevelAccess.com>
Received on Tuesday, 22 August 2017 17:04:22 UTC