- From: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2017 08:57:13 +0100
- To: Bryan Garaventa <bryan.garaventa@levelaccess.com>
- Cc: ARIA Working Group <public-aria@w3.org>
Received on Saturday, 19 August 2017 07:58:17 UTC
> > If an element is meant to be explicitly hidden, should it remain an active > live region regardless? I don't believe it should, but this does not mean that its contents cannot be referenced via aria-labelledby/describedby when hidden. -- Regards SteveF Current Standards Work @W3C <http://www.paciellogroup.com/blog/2015/03/current-standards-work-at-w3c/> On 19 August 2017 at 00:25, Bryan Garaventa <bryan.garaventa@levelaccess.com > wrote: > Hi, > Today I was asked whether live regions are allowed on hidden elements, and > I thought this was a simple no, but in looking at the spec and testing, it > appears people's understanding of this is all over the map. > > E.G An element like a div that includes CSS display:none or > visibility:hidden, or the HTML5 hidden attribute, or even > aria-hidden="true". > > If an element is meant to be explicitly hidden, should it remain an active > live region regardless? > > Thanks, > Bryan > > > Bryan Garaventa > Accessibility Fellow > Level Access, Inc. > Bryan.Garaventa@LevelAccess.com > 415.624.2709 (o) > www.LevelAccess.com > > >
Received on Saturday, 19 August 2017 07:58:17 UTC