- From: Joanmarie Diggs <jdiggs@igalia.com>
- Date: Mon, 9 May 2016 17:02:17 -0400
- To: Matt King <a11ythinker@gmail.com>
- Cc: 'ARIA Working Group' <public-aria@w3.org>
Hey Matt. On 05/09/2016 04:55 PM, Matt King wrote: > In the HTML-AAM, The ARIA column is blank for contenteditable. > > What if it mapped to role="textbox" aria-multiline=true? That would clear up > this issue, right? It may be somewhat nuclear in its approach, but it seems > to be how the world works today. [...] I do not believe it would clear up this issue. It would address the unsupported role use. But we'd still have the situation in which the author put aria-readonly="true" on the contenteditable causing screen readers to present an editable element as not-editable/readonly. --joanie
Received on Monday, 9 May 2016 21:02:53 UTC