- From: Fred Esch <fesch@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 08:53:25 -0400
- To: Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org>
- Cc: ARIA <public-aria@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <OF322CCAB5.4F35E78B-ON85257FDB.0045779C-85257FDB.0046CF51@notes.na.collabserv.c>
Michael, That is the right interpretation. I am not responding specifically for a password role, just pointing out that with the declining use of HTML forms and form related controls that there are gaps in what authors can tell AT. Regards, Fred Esch Watson, IBM, W3C Accessibility IBM Watson Watson Release Management and Quality From: Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org> To: Fred Esch/Arlington/IBM@IBMUS Cc: ARIA <public-aria@w3.org> Date: 06/22/2016 04:44 PM Subject: Use cases for password Hi Fred - if I understand your message you're not responding specifically on the risks of the password role, but suggesting a use case for the role. Is that correct? In that case, I think it will help the discussion if we keep the threads separate, so I'm replying with a new subject line to start a thread on use cases. If I've got your intent wrong, let me know, and perhaps you could clarify how the example you provided relates to the risks of the role thread. Michel On 22/06/2016 4:28 PM, Fred Esch wrote: Michael, A trend I see is developers moving away from using forms. With libraries like angularJS, it easy to bind your data model to UI so there is no benefit to the application to use a form/input elements over a div with contenteditable true. And without roles to support what the custom controls replace it will be hard to convey the control to AT. Sorry I couldn't find a password example but the comments apply there as well. A custom search on curated terms might look like this. customsed in a search HTML for the mulitsearch below. Note as you type, the completion list appears and if you select from the list is adds the selected term the set of pills. The outermost div in the HTML below has a blue border around it in the picture. <div class='searchbar' ng-controller="searchboxCtrl" > <!-- Pill for each selected search term --> <div class='pill' ng-repeat="item in data | itemSelected"> <button class='noBackground' data-ind="{{item.ind}}" ng-click= 'deleteTerm($event)'>{{item.name}} <img alt="remove from search" src="icon/x.svg" width="10" height="10" class='pillIcon'> </button> </div> <div id='contactSearch' contenteditable="true" aria-haspopup='true' ng-keyup='searchEvent($event)' role='search'></div> <!-- search button with magnifying glass -> <button class='noBackground'> <img alt="search contacts" src="icon/search_24.svg" class="rightbar"> </button> <!-- Completion list --> <div class='popup' id='searchPopup' visibility='hidden'> <ul class='completionList'> <li class='completion' ng-repeat="item in matchedList" data-ind= "{{item.ind}}" ng-blur='liBlur' ng-keydown='liEvent($event)'> {{item.name}}</li> </ul> </div> </div> Regards, Fred Esch Watson, IBM, W3C Accessibility IBM Watson Release Management and Watson Quality Inactive hide16 02:54:13 PM---OnRichard Schwerdtfeger wrote: > WellMichael Cooper ---06/22/2016 02:54:13 PM---On 22/06/2016 1:58 PM, Richard Schwerdtfeger wrote: > Well, From: Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org> To: Richard Schwerdtfeger <richschwer@gmail.com> Cc: ARIA <public-aria@w3.org> Date: 06/22/2016 02:54 PM Subject: Re: Risks the password role does create On 22/06/2016 1:58 PM, Richard Schwerdtfeger wrote: Well, Michael, as it turns out input type=“password” is not secure either. I will be filing an APA issue. This does bring up some concerns about the bar we should meet. One argument in the WG against the password role (though properly I think that is an argument against custom passwords, not the role per se) is that HTML passwords are more secure. But the HTML 5.1 password spec doesn't say much about the security protections user agents provide, aside from "The user agent should obscure the value so that people other than the user cannot see it." For custom password fields, that would be an author responsibility, regardless of whether they use the password role. I can't find any other guidance in the HTML spec about protecting password fields, and this has likely been true for several versions. Maybe there is some de facto security implemented long ago by most browsers so there wasn't seen a need to address it in the spec, though since a main goal of HTML 5 was to document existing browser behavior, it's a surprise this didn't come up. I don't have information about what proportion of user agents do provide that security, and wonder if interoperability testing data exists on this. If Rich has found implementations that don't meet the level of security we assume, then it brings further questions about whether comparing to HTML should be a reason for decisions we make on the ARIA feature. At the moment I think the draft ARIA password role text has more security guidance for AT and authors than the HTML spec. Michael
Attachments
- image/gif attachment: 0F822404.gif
- image/gif attachment: graycol.gif
- image/jpeg attachment: 0F058171.jpg
Received on Thursday, 23 June 2016 13:00:46 UTC