W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-aria@w3.org > February 2016

RE: aria-ISSUE-1015 (uia-express): Firefox interested in doing UIA-Express. We may need to un-deprecate it. [ARIA 1.1 Core Mapping Specification]

From: Cynthia Shelly <cyns@microsoft.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 20:16:30 +0000
To: Rich Schwerdtfeger <richschwer@gmail.com>, "Accessible Rich Internet Applications Working Group" <public-aria@w3.org>
Message-ID: <SN1PR0301MB1535B7D3A5A980430A77D04EC6A70@SN1PR0301MB1535.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
I started a thread about this that includes Alex Surkov and the AAPI task force. Probably better to ask this question there, since I can only guess.
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-aria/2016Feb/0453.html 

-----Original Message-----
From: Rich Schwerdtfeger [mailto:richschwer@gmail.com] 
Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 11:54 AM
To: Accessible Rich Internet Applications Working Group <public-aria@w3.org>
Subject: Re: aria-ISSUE-1015 (uia-express): Firefox interested in doing UIA-Express. We may need to un-deprecate it. [ARIA 1.1 Core Mapping Specification]

That is a big add in testing for an API that nobody else is implementing? 

Why?

Sent from my iPhone

> On Feb 26, 2016, at 11:20 AM, Accessible Rich Internet Applications Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote:
> 
> aria-ISSUE-1015 (uia-express): Firefox interested in doing UIA-Express. We may need to un-deprecate it. [ARIA 1.1 Core Mapping Specification]
> 
> http://www.w3.org/WAI/ARIA/track/issues/1015
> 
> Raised by: Cynthia Shelly
> On product: ARIA 1.1 Core Mapping Specification
> 
> Firefox has expressed interest in doing UIA Express. We may need to un-deprecate it. If we do that, I propose we start by copying the UIA column, and then making notes where there is a difference.
> 
> 
> 
Received on Friday, 26 February 2016 20:17:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:23:20 UTC