W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-aria@w3.org > February 2016

RE: APG Landmark Design Pattern Update and Questions related to Banner and Contenting landmarks

From: Matt King <a11ythinker@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 07:20:38 -0800
To: "'Steve Faulkner'" <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>, "'Gunderson, Jon R'" <jongund@illinois.edu>
Cc: "'James Nurthen'" <james.nurthen@oracle.com>, <public-aria@w3.org>
Message-ID: <021101d1634d$6f1f7820$4d5e6860$@Gmail.com>
+1 … I took an action to make it say that.

 

From: Steve Faulkner [mailto:faulkner.steve@gmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, February 9, 2016 2:11 AM
To: Gunderson, Jon R <jongund@illinois.edu>
Cc: Matt King <a11ythinker@gmail.com>; James Nurthen <james.nurthen@oracle.com>; public-aria@w3.org
Subject: Re: APG Landmark Design Pattern Update and Questions related to Banner and Contenting landmarks

 

 

On 8 February 2016 at 17:39, Gunderson, Jon R <jongund@illinois.edu <mailto:jongund@illinois.edu> > wrote:

What do you think the design recommendation should be for “banner” and “contentinfo”?

 

I think the advice should be

"A page should have only one banner/contentinfo/main landmark."

there are circumstances where this may not be true (thus the 'should'), but the vast majority of pages this is a good rule of thumb.




--

Regards

SteveF

Current Standards Work @W3C <http://www.paciellogroup.com/blog/2015/03/current-standards-work-at-w3c/> 
Received on Tuesday, 9 February 2016 15:21:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:23:19 UTC