- From: Cynthia Shelly <cyns@microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2016 00:20:00 +0000
- To: Accessible Rich Internet Applications Working Group <public-aria@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 7 April 2016 00:20:31 UTC
https://www.w3.org/WAI/ARIA/track/issues/647 There's an html5accessibility.com test case relating to aria-hidden=false overriding html hidden attribute. The ARIA 1.1 spec is ambiguous on what should happen, and the Core-AAM says "not mapped" for false in all cases. We need to decide on the correct behavior for the markup below: HTML5accessibility.com test asserts that the paragraph (id=1) and the button (id=2) should be visually hidden, but available in the AAPI. Does the ARIA WG agree? <p hidden aria-hidden="false" id="1">one</p> <input id="2" type="button" hidden aria-hidden="false" /> What about aria-hidden=false objects that are children of hidden or display:none? Should the paragraph (id=4) be in the accessibility tree? <div hidden id=3>two<p aria-hidden=false id=4>three</p>four</div>
Received on Thursday, 7 April 2016 00:20:31 UTC