- From: Richard Wallis <richard.wallis@dataliberate.com>
- Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2015 11:03:45 +0100
- To: public-architypes <public-architypes@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAD47Kz7M_S6Mkeze1c-EayqKMdUjGeoVbuCH7Pq-9fT7T1C1Ow@mail.gmail.com>
In other threads we have been discussing how to describe an Archive as an Organization/LocalBusiness <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-architypes/2015Jul/0002.html> when appropriate, and how to describe an ArchiveCollection <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-architypes/2015Jul/0008.html>. Now I think it is time to add one more area to our attention - how to describe the physical/digital things that we find within an archive collection. In archives we find all types of things from creative works such as books, letters, artworks, videos, web pages etc., to furniture, personal items, vehicles, fossils, rocks and of course the favourite box of things yet to be identified. From what I understand there are certain common categories of things such as physical creative works, digital creative works, physical containers of things identified or not, but it would be far too limiting to build our recommendations around these. The result is that we need to be able to describe anything that could be found in an archive which means *anything!*. Fortunately in our world all these things have one aspect in common - they are in an archive. If we can establish a set of descriptive properties that would be of use in describing an item's place and role in an archive, we can then look to some, schema.org, techniques to apply them alongside other properties that are already available in the Schema vocabulary. Properties that come to mind include: isPartOf - a reference to the collection a thing is in condition - state of preservation of an item containedIn - the box or digital file containing the item curatedBy curationDate CurationEvent - possibly a better way to describe a curation event - linking where when and by who location - of item, not necessarily the collection location We could look to already existent standards, CIDOC-CRM for example, as a source of inspiration. So, over to you for suggestions. Once we have assemble a few by email discussion, we can create a page in the Wiki to capture them and become the basis for the core of our proposals. ~Richard. Richard Wallis Founder, Data Liberate http://dataliberate.com Linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/in/richardwallis Twitter: @rjw
Received on Wednesday, 5 August 2015 10:04:14 UTC