- From: Richard Wallis <richard.wallis@dataliberate.com>
- Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 13:02:06 +0100
- To: public-architypes@w3.org
- Cc: dan@coffeecode.net
- Message-ID: <CAD47Kz4mtOX8GtmcFC1CZGhna8sw+Fy0wqK63_m_aodZKgK1iw@mail.gmail.com>
This is the first of a few conversations we need to start in building towards some consensus around proposals <https://www.w3.org/community/architypes/wiki/Main_Page>. Prior to the setting up of this group Dan Scott proposed <https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues/628> a new Schema.org type 'Archive': In preparing to attend the LODLAM Summit 2015 (Linked Open Data for Libraries, Archives, and Museums), it is glaringly evident that we are missing a class to represent archives. The simplest possible place to start would be to parallel schema:Library <http://schema.org/Library> by subclassing schema:LocalBusiness <http://schema.org/LocalBusiness> with a definition such as "An entity that collects documents and records related to the activities of people or organizations." This would enable us to describe archives as a specific class of LocalBusiness with schema.org, rather than having to use LocalBusiness directly. This raised comments regarding the too commercial nature of the LocalBusiness definition, which could be enhanced to include something along lines that "businesses may also be not-for-profit or state-owned." Are we happy to take on that proposal - do we have comments? ~Richard Richard Wallis Founder, Data Liberate http://dataliberate.com Linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/in/richardwallis Twitter: @rjw
Received on Monday, 27 July 2015 12:02:34 UTC