Re: [AR Standards Discussion] WebRTC beyond the call and the new #RealityCube model

Hey Rob,

Interesting classification/visualization with the cube! The only thing I'm
missing now from the SlideShare presentation is the definition of some of
the terms you've used for some segments of the dimensions, e.g.
"bio/ar/av/vr" mediation. The model is probably too complex for "the
public" (everything fancy with a screen and a camera will probably be
labeled "augmented reality" for a while to come), it could give _us_ some
handholds when discussing different applications.

Cheers,

Jens


On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 2:43 AM, Rob Manson <roBman@mob-labs.com> wrote:

> Hi Carl,
>
> thanks for the feedback.
>
> Yeah I think it's going to be interesting mapping the percentage of the
> population that spend a large amount of their time in each of the cubes.
>
> Up until recently we've really only had one or two available at all.
>
> Right now there's more available but we only pop into the new ones for a
> few moments at a time - and based on most AR experiences up until now we
> often don't return.
>
> But with the move to wearables we're going to start seeing people on-mass
> for the first time really start to live in these new cubes just like Thad,
> Steve and cohorts have for years now.
>
> I think this will be an interesting way to visualise and watch this
> evolution.
>
> roBman
>
>
>
> On 12/07/13 23:06, Carl Byers wrote:
>
>> Thanks Rob.
>> The multi-dimensional definition space is certainly reflects the range of
>> 'realities' much more effectively.
>> I think this is also an evolving temporal (i.e., non-static) reflection,
>> in the sense that the level of engagement and 'feel' of the 'non-real'
>> experience over time will likely define the extent to which we eventually
>> view augmentation as the new 'real' world.
>>
>> Carl Byers
>> Vice President, Products and Business Development
>> t: 613.688.5660 x303 |  c: 613.851.1712  |  f: 604.669.9972  |  e:
>> cbyers@ngrain.com
>> ______________________________**______________________________**
>> ___________
>> NGRAIN | Transform the way people share knowledge
>> Suite 207, 75 Albert St |  Ottawa, ON Canada  |  K1P 5E7
>> Suite 108, 100 Gateway Center Parkway |  Richmond, VA USA  |  23235
>> Suite 200, 740 Nicola St  |  Vancouver, BC Canada  |  V6G 2C1
>> www.ngrain.com | ngrainblog.com | twitter.com/ngrain
>>
>> NOTICE TO RECIPIENT:  The contents of this e-mail message, including any
>> attachments, are meant only for the intended recipient of the transmission.
>>  It contains information that is confidential and proprietary to the sender
>> and/or the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient of
>> this message, be advised that any dissemination, distribution, or use of
>> the contents of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you received this
>> message in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail and please
>> permanently delete all copies of the original e-mail and any attached
>> documentation from any computer or other media.  Thank you in advance for
>> your cooperation.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: discussion-bounces@**arstandards.org<discussion-bounces@arstandards.org>[mailto:
>> discussion-bounces@**arstandards.org <discussion-bounces@arstandards.org>]
>> On Behalf Of Rob Manson
>> Sent: July 10, 2013 22:56
>> To: public-ar@w3.org; discussion@arstandards.org
>> Subject: [AR Standards Discussion] WebRTC beyond the call and the new
>> #RealityCube model
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> here's a follow up from some of the conferences recently.
>>
>> First is a video of an interesting panel session at WebRTC World in
>> Atlanta that discusses looking at WebRTC beyond the call. Great to see the
>> momentum that the underlying Augmented Web concepts are gaining.
>> They're not using the right term yet but it's obvious that it's clear to
>> everyone this is coming 8)
>> http://www.webrtcworld.com/**videos.aspx?vid=8621<http://www.webrtcworld.com/videos.aspx?vid=8621>
>>
>> And here's the #RealityCube model I presented at the IEEE ISTAS13
>> conference (http://veillance.me) in Toronto. It's a new typology for
>> describing the different flavours of Mixed Reality and allows us to be more
>> explicit when discussing and analysing a specific type of technology.
>> http://www.slideshare.net/**robman/the-futureis-unreal<http://www.slideshare.net/robman/the-futureis-unreal>
>>
>> Love to hear your thoughts on these.
>>
>> roBman
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> Discussion mailing list
>> Discussion@arstandards.org
>> http://arstandards.org/**mailman/listinfo/discussion<http://arstandards.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion>
>>
>>  ______________________________**_________________
> Discussion mailing list
> Discussion@arstandards.org
> http://arstandards.org/**mailman/listinfo/discussion<http://arstandards.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion>
>



-- 
Jens de Smit | Server Team Lead
| jens@layar.com | @jfdsmit | +31 628 597 403 |