Re: [XBL] Editorial: no link to pseudo elements

On Fri, 3 Nov 2006, Marcos Caceres wrote:
> 
> In section 2.8, maybe you could include a "see Matching Pseudo-Elements" 
> after the text "The valid pseudo-elements are "value", "choices", 
> "label", "repeat-item", and "icon".
> 
> So it would read:
> The valid pseudo-elements are "value", "choices", "label", "repeat-item", and
> "icon" (see Matching Pseudo-Elements).

Moved the "see" from the previous paragraph to that paragraph. Let me know 
if that's ok. I don't really want to have it in both, that looks silly.


> The first time I read this, I was unsure as to where these 
> pseudo-elements were being defined in the spec (or if they where defined 
> in some other CSS spec? or both).

Added a sentence to clarify this a little.

Cheers,
-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'

Received on Friday, 5 January 2007 05:01:43 UTC