- From: Marcos Caceres <m.caceres@qut.edu.au>
- Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 12:27:22 +1000
- To: "'Ian Hickson'" <ian@hixie.ch>
- Cc: <public-appformats@w3.org>
Excellent, thanks! Marcos -----Original Message----- From: Ian Hickson [mailto:ian@hixie.ch] Sent: Friday, 5 January 2007 3:02 PM To: Marcos Caceres Cc: public-appformats@w3.org Subject: Re: [XBL] Editorial: no link to pseudo elements On Fri, 3 Nov 2006, Marcos Caceres wrote: > > In section 2.8, maybe you could include a "see Matching Pseudo-Elements" > after the text "The valid pseudo-elements are "value", "choices", > "label", "repeat-item", and "icon". > > So it would read: > The valid pseudo-elements are "value", "choices", "label", "repeat-item", and > "icon" (see Matching Pseudo-Elements). Moved the "see" from the previous paragraph to that paragraph. Let me know if that's ok. I don't really want to have it in both, that looks silly. > The first time I read this, I was unsure as to where these > pseudo-elements were being defined in the spec (or if they where defined > in some other CSS spec? or both). Added a sentence to clarify this a little. Cheers, -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Monday, 8 January 2007 02:27:55 UTC