Re: [XBL] clarification: explicit children must be redistributed?

On Sat, 4 Nov 2006, Marcos Caceres wrote:
> 
> Can you please add a little more detail to clarify how point 6 in 
> Section 3.5 works. It currently reads:
> 
>  If the new binding changes which shadow trees contribute to the final 
>  flattened tree then the explicit children must be redistributed.
> 
> I've read section "processing content elements", but I am still a bit 
> unclear about how this step works.

I don't really understand what isn't clear... Could you describe to me 
what your interpretation of that sentence is, so that I can work out what 
it is that needs changing/improving?

Thanks,
-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'

Received on Friday, 5 January 2007 05:13:03 UTC