- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 12:39:41 +0100
- To: "WAF WG (public)" <public-appformats@w3.org>, member-accesscontrol-tf@w3.org
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 12:24:29 +0100, Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org> wrote: > This version presents the "global exceptions" approach as, > basically, a done deal. Nothing is a done deal in a working draft, imo. > I'd strongly prefer the "local exceptions" approach that I had > proposed to go into the next working draft. Since I understand that > you don't feel very strongly either way (and haven't seen anyone > else chime in on this point), please change things accordingly > before publishing the draft. Heh, you make it sound like it's simple. I'll see what I can do. I agree it's slightly nicer although it does complicate the model and increases the likelyhood people make mistakes (I think). > (I've sent regrets for the telco on Wednesday since I'm attending a > project face-to-face this week.) -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Tuesday, 13 February 2007 11:39:47 UTC