- From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 13:56:57 +0100
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Cc: "WAF WG (public)" <public-appformats@w3.org>, member-accesscontrol-tf@w3.org
On 2007-02-13 12:39:41 +0100, Anne van Kesteren wrote: >>This version presents the "global exceptions" approach as, >>basically, a done deal. > Nothing is a done deal in a working draft, imo. True; I phrased that badly. What I meant was that no issue around it was explicitly called out. >>I'd strongly prefer the "local exceptions" approach that I had >>proposed to go into the next working draft. Since I understand >>that you don't feel very strongly either way (and haven't seen >>anyone else chime in on this point), please change things >>accordingly before publishing the draft. > Heh, you make it sound like it's simple. It is! > I agree it's slightly nicer although it does complicate the model > and increases the likelyhood people make mistakes (I think). That's where we disagree. ;) -- Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 13 February 2007 13:28:39 UTC