- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Sat, 05 Aug 2006 09:10:25 +0200
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Cc: public-appformats@w3.org
* Ian Hickson wrote: >If it's optional, and thus not supported, what's the point? For the sake of argument, implementers who want to offer authors the ability to use XPath in XBL2 would know how to, making it less likely that poor engineering decisions are made and less likely that multiple vendors offer this support in incompatible ways. It could also have adverse effects, for example, authors might read the specification and annoy browser vendors with feature requests. -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Saturday, 5 August 2006 07:10:40 UTC