- From: John Foliot <john@foliot.ca>
- Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2021 12:12:12 -0500
- To: Lisa Seeman <lisa1seeman@gmail.com>
- Cc: W3C WAI Accessible Platform Architectures <public-apa@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 1 February 2021 17:13:03 UTC
Hi Lisa, COGA is (was?) a *joint* task force between APA and AG Working Groups, and I neither see nor hear a proposal to eliminate COGA, only to no longer make it a joint TF with APA. From my perspective, APA and AG WG will continue to coordinate and work together, and so I am wondering if you can articulate specific reasons for keeping the joint relationship active, versus allowing COGA to remain a TF of AG WG. I note that there are other Task Forces under AG WG that do not have a joint partnership structure (Low Vision, "mobile"/touch interfaces, XR) and so I'd like to understand why you feel COGA should be treated differently than those other Task Forces? What advantages are gained by remaining a joint Task Force? Thanks JF On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 10:58 AM Lisa Seeman <lisa1seeman@gmail.com> wrote: > I strongly feel that APA and COGA must have a formal relationship and an > improved process of working together that means ApA's work will includ COGA > concerns. > I object to a charter that does not include this and removes coga as a > task force. > > As you know we have an important publication this month. It was on COGAs > time table (as agreed) as the first item after our publication to work with > the co-chairs to improve this process. > > > All the best > > Lisa Seeman >
Received on Monday, 1 February 2021 17:13:03 UTC