- From: Chaals McCathie Nevile <chaals@yandex-team.ru>
- Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2016 14:41:38 +0100
- To: "John Foliot" <john.foliot@deque.com>, "James Nurthen" <james@nurthen.com>
- Cc: public-apa@w3.org
On Wed, 27 Jan 2016 21:13:38 +0100, James Nurthen <james@nurthen.com> wrote: > Note that Respec does have colour contrast problems - I just checked the > ARIA spec. > I found the following issues > > NOTE boxes - the text NOTE fails the colour contrast ratio > EXAMPLE Boxes - the test EXAMPLE X fails the colour contrast ratio > green attribute value text within the examples and elsewhere, fails the > colour contrast ratio > Green Editors Note text in yellow boxes fails the colour contrast ratio Does someone have a suggestion for colours that would meet the ratio? cheers > Regards, > James > > > On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 10:21 AM, John Foliot <john.foliot@deque.com> > wrote: > >> Colleagues, >> >> >> >> The Draft minutes (minus, apparently, ACTION items assigned – probably >> my >> bad) can be found at: >> https://www.w3.org/2016/01/27-apa-minutes.html >> >> >> Text version (with ACTIONS) follows: >> >> - DRAFT -Accessible Platform Architectures Working Group >> Teleconference27 >> Jan 2016 >> >> See also: IRC log <http://www.w3.org/2016/01/27-apa-irc> >> Attendees >> >> *Present* >> >> *Janina, JF, fesch* >> >> *Regrets* >> >> *Leonie, Joanie, Shane* >> >> *Chair* >> >> *SV_MEETING_CHAIR* >> >> *Scribe* >> >> *JF* >> Contents >> >> - Topics <https://www.w3.org/2016/01/27-apa-minutes.html#agenda> >> >> 1. preview agenda with items from two minutes >> <https://www.w3.org/2016/01/27-apa-minutes.html#item01> >> >> 2. Actions Review (Specs) >> http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/actions/open >> <https://www.w3.org/2016/01/27-apa-minutes.html#item02> >> >> 3. Decision Policy -- Ready for CfC? >> http://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/decision-policy >> <https://www.w3.org/2016/01/27-apa-minutes.html#item03> >> >> 4. Actions Review (Specs) >> http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/actions/open >> <https://www.w3.org/2016/01/27-apa-minutes.html#item04> >> >> - Summary of Action Items >> <https://www.w3.org/2016/01/27-apa-minutes.html#ActionSummary> >> - Summary of Resolutions >> <https://www.w3.org/2016/01/27-apa-minutes.html#ResolutionSummary> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> <*Zakim*> joanie, you wanted to ask about moving the action >> preview agenda with items from two minutes >> >> <*scribe*> scribe: JF >> >> *JS:* looking to set up a different system for looking at Spec review >> ... to remove the dependancy on Michael Cooper >> >> *JF:* some discussion kicking off around starting a TF focused on >> writing >> unit tests, not only for ARIA 1.1 but perhaps other efforts as well >> >> *JS:* we should also revisit CSS Flexbox discussions with CSS WG >> >> *CYNS:* have been having some back-channel discussions there as well >> >> *JS:* look to revisit in February >> >> *Cyns:* MS has become a lot more engaged in this activity. With the >> split >> of ARIA and APA, MSFT is adding a new person to the work >> Actions Review (Specs) >> http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/actions/openDecision >> Policy -- Ready for CfC? http://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/decision-policy >> >> *JS:* there has been discussion here and in the ARIA WG - there has been >> a bit of a re-write to help clarify and avoid some 'gotchas' >> >> with a note that CfC's need to be handled on the admin list, not the >> main >> discussion list >> >> which was the purpose of the admin list - it allows us to restrict the >> participation (comments, welcome, long discussions essentially not) >> >> *JS:* believe we are ready for a CfC on this topic - Janina to issue the >> CfC later this week or next, in sync with the ARIA WG >> ... encouraging all to vote on both issues >> >> *RESOLUTION: meeting agrees to take Draft Decision Policy to CfC* >> Actions Review (Specs) http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/actions/open >> >> *MC:* >> >> <*MichaelC*> https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/products/8 >> >> *MC:* Action 2001 >> >> *JS:* on Leonie, who is not here today >> >> ACTION 1749 >> >> *RS:* don't believe there is much here >> >> *MC:* Potentially we can close this as it is moving forward elsewhere >> and >> appears to be OK >> >> *Cyns:* leave open, and will report back soon >> >> <*MichaelC*> close action-1749 >> >> <*trackbot*> Closed action-1749. >> >> <*MichaelC*> action-1749: needs device independent stuff, but separate >> action >> >> <*trackbot*> Notes added to action-1749 Review ui events. >> >> *MC:* Need to record this in a wiki page as well >> >> *JS:* this is where we need multiple hands working together >> ... we received a request for comments earlier this week >> >> <*janina*> https://github.com/w3c/manifest/issues/419 >> >> we just need a way to annotate the graphic, in use-cases where it may >> be a >> help screen or similar >> >> https://www.w3.org/TR/appmanifest/ >> >> <*MichaelC*> needs device independent stuff, but separate action >> >> <*MichaelC*> needs device independent stuff, but separate action >> >> <*MichaelC*> >> https://github.com/w3c/manifest/commit/04d72e16764068dea1f353e781312e325fd774f7 >> >> *JS:* sounds like we need to provide them with some info and details on >> providing better alt text and descriptions >> ... James N had issues around the spash screen scenario >> >> *MC:* issues around color contrast as well >> ... who is taking the next step on this >> ... we should get cynthia to join the discussion to confuse everyone >> >> [laughter] >> >> *JS:* should we check back with Shane to see if Respec is a root of some >> problems? >> >> *fesch:* Is this the issue with red text on pink background? >> >> *MC:* sort of yes, but Respec had been tested previously and was pretty >> good a11y wise >> ... we use Respec as well, and know a maintainer >> ... we should push back >> >> *JS:* perhaps its in the way we are using Respec versus how they are? >> >> *fesch:* they are using warnings, etc. I've not seen before >> >> <*ShaneM*> I am deep in the middle of other stuff right now, but please >> feel free to assign me any ReSpec related actions. >> >> *JS:* give action to Shane? >> >> <*ShaneM*> Note that since I am not on the call, the action could use a >> little context ;-) >> >> *MC:* found a diagram with poor color contrast (in SVG) >> >> <*ShaneM*> ok >> >> <*janina*> Also, diag needs extended text descript >> >> <*janina*> Or even to be accessible svg >> >> issues around color contrast in the Respec CSS >> Summary of Action Items >> >> ACTION: Fred to review Media Queries Level 4 >> https://www.w3.org/TR/mediaqueries-4/ [1] >> >> recorded in http://www.w3.org/2016/01/27-apa-irc#T18-04-44 >> >> >> >> ACTION: foliot to draft comment to ensure authoring guidance is provide >> on >> EME https://www.w3.org/TR/encrypted-media/ [2] >> >> recorded in http://www.w3.org/2016/01/27-apa-irc#T18-09-59 >> >> >> >> ACTION: fred to review SHACL Use Cases and Requirements >> https://www.w3.org/TR/shacl-ucr/ [3] >> >> recorded in http://www.w3.org/2016/01/27-apa-irc#T18-11-57 >> Summary of Resolutions >> >> 1. meeting agrees to take Draft Decision Policy to CfC >> <https://www.w3.org/2016/01/27-apa-minutes.html#resolution01> >> >> [End of minutes] >> >> >> >> -- >> >> John Foliot >> >> Principal Accessibility Strategist >> >> Deque Systems Inc. >> >> john.foliot@deque.com >> >> >> >> Advancing the mission of digital accessibility and inclusion >> >> >> -- Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex chaals@yandex-team.ru - - - Find more at http://yandex.com
Received on Friday, 29 January 2016 13:42:15 UTC