W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-apa@w3.org > January 2016

Re: Draft Minutes 1/27/16

From: Chaals McCathie Nevile <chaals@yandex-team.ru>
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2016 14:41:38 +0100
To: "John Foliot" <john.foliot@deque.com>, "James Nurthen" <james@nurthen.com>
Cc: public-apa@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.ybz5nopws7agh9@widsith.local>
On Wed, 27 Jan 2016 21:13:38 +0100, James Nurthen <james@nurthen.com>  
wrote:

> Note that Respec does have colour contrast problems - I just checked the
> ARIA spec.
> I found the following issues
>
> NOTE boxes - the text NOTE fails the colour contrast ratio
> EXAMPLE Boxes - the test EXAMPLE X fails the colour contrast ratio
> green attribute value text within the examples and elsewhere, fails the
> colour contrast ratio
> Green Editors Note text in yellow boxes fails the colour contrast ratio

Does someone have a suggestion for colours that would meet the ratio?

cheers

> Regards,
> James
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 10:21 AM, John Foliot <john.foliot@deque.com>  
> wrote:
>
>> Colleagues,
>>
>>
>>
>> The Draft minutes (minus, apparently, ACTION items assigned – probably  
>> my
>> bad) can be found at:
>> https://www.w3.org/2016/01/27-apa-minutes.html
>>
>>
>> Text version (with ACTIONS) follows:
>>
>> - DRAFT -Accessible Platform Architectures Working Group  
>> Teleconference27
>> Jan 2016
>>
>> See also: IRC log <http://www.w3.org/2016/01/27-apa-irc>
>> Attendees
>>
>> *Present*
>>
>> *Janina, JF, fesch*
>>
>> *Regrets*
>>
>> *Leonie, Joanie, Shane*
>>
>> *Chair*
>>
>> *SV_MEETING_CHAIR*
>>
>> *Scribe*
>>
>> *JF*
>> Contents
>>
>>    - Topics <https://www.w3.org/2016/01/27-apa-minutes.html#agenda>
>>
>> 1.    preview agenda with items from two minutes
>> <https://www.w3.org/2016/01/27-apa-minutes.html#item01>
>>
>> 2.    Actions Review (Specs)
>> http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/actions/open
>> <https://www.w3.org/2016/01/27-apa-minutes.html#item02>
>>
>> 3.    Decision Policy -- Ready for CfC?
>> http://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/decision-policy
>> <https://www.w3.org/2016/01/27-apa-minutes.html#item03>
>>
>> 4.    Actions Review (Specs)
>> http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/actions/open
>> <https://www.w3.org/2016/01/27-apa-minutes.html#item04>
>>
>>    - Summary of Action Items
>>    <https://www.w3.org/2016/01/27-apa-minutes.html#ActionSummary>
>>    - Summary of Resolutions
>>    <https://www.w3.org/2016/01/27-apa-minutes.html#ResolutionSummary>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> <*Zakim*> joanie, you wanted to ask about moving the action
>> preview agenda with items from two minutes
>>
>> <*scribe*> scribe: JF
>>
>> *JS:* looking to set up a different system for looking at Spec review
>> ... to remove the dependancy on Michael Cooper
>>
>> *JF:* some discussion kicking off around starting a TF focused on  
>> writing
>> unit tests, not only for ARIA 1.1 but perhaps other efforts as well
>>
>> *JS:* we should also revisit CSS Flexbox discussions with CSS WG
>>
>> *CYNS:* have been having some back-channel discussions there as well
>>
>> *JS:* look to revisit in February
>>
>> *Cyns:* MS has become a lot more engaged in this activity. With the  
>> split
>> of ARIA and APA, MSFT is adding a new person to the work
>> Actions Review (Specs)  
>> http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/actions/openDecision
>> Policy -- Ready for CfC? http://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/decision-policy
>>
>> *JS:* there has been discussion here and in the ARIA WG - there has been
>> a bit of a re-write to help clarify and avoid some 'gotchas'
>>
>> with a note that CfC's need to be handled on the admin list, not the  
>> main
>> discussion list
>>
>> which was the purpose of the admin list - it allows us to restrict the
>> participation (comments, welcome, long discussions essentially not)
>>
>> *JS:* believe we are ready for a CfC on this topic - Janina to issue the
>> CfC later this week or next, in sync with the ARIA WG
>> ... encouraging all to vote on both issues
>>
>> *RESOLUTION: meeting agrees to take Draft Decision Policy to CfC*
>> Actions Review (Specs) http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/actions/open
>>
>> *MC:*
>>
>> <*MichaelC*> https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/products/8
>>
>> *MC:* Action 2001
>>
>> *JS:* on Leonie, who is not here today
>>
>> ACTION 1749
>>
>> *RS:* don't believe there is much here
>>
>> *MC:* Potentially we can close this as it is moving forward elsewhere  
>> and
>> appears to be OK
>>
>> *Cyns:* leave open, and will report back soon
>>
>> <*MichaelC*> close action-1749
>>
>> <*trackbot*> Closed action-1749.
>>
>> <*MichaelC*> action-1749: needs device independent stuff, but separate
>> action
>>
>> <*trackbot*> Notes added to action-1749 Review ui events.
>>
>> *MC:* Need to record this in a wiki page as well
>>
>> *JS:* this is where we need multiple hands working together
>> ... we received a request for comments earlier this week
>>
>> <*janina*> https://github.com/w3c/manifest/issues/419
>>
>> we just need a way to annotate the graphic, in use-cases where it may  
>> be a
>> help screen or similar
>>
>> https://www.w3.org/TR/appmanifest/
>>
>> <*MichaelC*> needs device independent stuff, but separate action
>>
>> <*MichaelC*> needs device independent stuff, but separate action
>>
>> <*MichaelC*>
>> https://github.com/w3c/manifest/commit/04d72e16764068dea1f353e781312e325fd774f7
>>
>> *JS:* sounds like we need to provide them with some info and details on
>> providing better alt text and descriptions
>> ... James N had issues around the spash screen scenario
>>
>> *MC:* issues around color contrast as well
>> ... who is taking the next step on this
>> ... we should get cynthia to join the discussion to confuse everyone
>>
>> [laughter]
>>
>> *JS:* should we check back with Shane to see if Respec is a root of some
>> problems?
>>
>> *fesch:* Is this the issue with red text on pink background?
>>
>> *MC:* sort of yes, but Respec had been tested previously and was pretty
>> good a11y wise
>> ... we use Respec as well, and know a maintainer
>> ... we should push back
>>
>> *JS:* perhaps its in the way we are using Respec versus how they are?
>>
>> *fesch:* they are using warnings, etc. I've not seen before
>>
>> <*ShaneM*> I am deep in the middle of other stuff right now, but please
>> feel free to assign me any ReSpec related actions.
>>
>> *JS:* give action to Shane?
>>
>> <*ShaneM*> Note that since I am not on the call, the action could use a
>> little context ;-)
>>
>> *MC:* found a diagram with poor color contrast (in SVG)
>>
>> <*ShaneM*> ok
>>
>> <*janina*> Also, diag needs extended text descript
>>
>> <*janina*> Or even to be accessible svg
>>
>> issues around color contrast in the Respec CSS
>> Summary of Action Items
>>
>> ACTION: Fred to review Media Queries Level 4
>> https://www.w3.org/TR/mediaqueries-4/ [1]
>>
>>    recorded in http://www.w3.org/2016/01/27-apa-irc#T18-04-44
>>
>>
>>
>> ACTION: foliot to draft comment to ensure authoring guidance is provide  
>> on
>> EME https://www.w3.org/TR/encrypted-media/ [2]
>>
>>    recorded in http://www.w3.org/2016/01/27-apa-irc#T18-09-59
>>
>>
>>
>> ACTION: fred to review SHACL Use Cases and Requirements
>> https://www.w3.org/TR/shacl-ucr/ [3]
>>
>>    recorded in http://www.w3.org/2016/01/27-apa-irc#T18-11-57
>> Summary of Resolutions
>>
>> 1.    meeting agrees to take Draft Decision Policy to CfC
>> <https://www.w3.org/2016/01/27-apa-minutes.html#resolution01>
>>
>> [End of minutes]
>>
>>
>>
>> ​--
>>
>> John Foliot
>>
>> Principal Accessibility Strategist
>>
>> Deque Systems Inc.
>>
>> john.foliot@deque.com
>>
>>
>>
>> Advancing the mission of digital accessibility and inclusion
>>
>>
>>


-- 
Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex
  chaals@yandex-team.ru - - - Find more at http://yandex.com
Received on Friday, 29 January 2016 13:42:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 29 January 2016 13:42:16 UTC