This is asking whether the entire HTML AAM effort should go to the ARIA WG. I doubt we have resources to do that unless the same people continue to work on it. Rich Rich Schwerdtfeger > On Aug 10, 2016, at 3:12 PM, Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org> wrote: > > The Web Platform group is working on a new charter: > > http://w3c.github.io/charter-html/group-charter.html > > I asked if was ok for APA and ARIA to review and Philippe said yes. > > I think APA should review from a view of deliverables and whether we need to / are able to work on accessibility review of them. But note that at a charter level there might not be anything specific to say unless there's a major flag. The important thing is that we can review the stuff in the ordinary course of business, which the charter already sets up provisions for. > > I think ARIA should look at the HTML Accessibility API Mappings, and in particular take a position on whether that should continue to be a joint deliverable between Web Platform and ARIA, or just become a sole deliverable of ARIA. It should also look at whether the necessary deliverables and coordinations are expressed to ensure ARIA works in HTML. There may be other deliverables that relate to ARIA work as well. > > Philippe asks that comments be filed via GitHub: > > https://github.com/w3c/charter-html/issues/ > > But it might be best if I aggregate any WG feedback rather than get a bunch of people filing issues. I'm not sure there will be feedback, but thought it was important that these groups have the opportunity to review. > > Michael > >
Received on Wednesday, 10 August 2016 20:21:10 UTC