W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-apa@w3.org > August 2016

Re: Web Platform charter under development

From: Léonie Watson <tink@tink.uk>
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2016 09:56:04 +0100
To: Rich Schwerdtfeger <richschwer@gmail.com>, Mike Cooper <cooper@w3.org>
Cc: Accessible Platform Architectures Working Group <public-apa@w3.org>, ARIA <public-aria@w3.org>
Message-ID: <8e124616-1280-12ff-e3fb-25cca9e0fe57@tink.uk>
It might make sense for the HTML AAM work to be done alongside the other 
AAM work within the ARIA WG. Of the three current editors only one 
(Steve) is a member of WP, whereas they are all members of the ARIA WG I 
believe.

Léonie.



-- 
@LeonieWatson tink.uk Carpe diem

On 10/08/2016 21:20, Rich Schwerdtfeger wrote:
> This is asking whether the entire HTML AAM effort should go to the ARIA
> WG. I doubt we have resources to do that unless the same people continue
> to work on it.
>
> Rich
>
> Rich Schwerdtfeger
>
>
>
>
>> On Aug 10, 2016, at 3:12 PM, Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org
>> <mailto:cooper@w3.org>> wrote:
>>
>> The Web Platform group is working on a new charter:
>>
>> http://w3c.github.io/charter-html/group-charter.html
>>
>> I asked if was ok for APA and ARIA to review and Philippe said yes.
>>
>> I think APA should review from a view of deliverables and whether we
>> need to / are able to work on accessibility review of them. But note
>> that at a charter level there might not be anything specific to say
>> unless there's a major flag. The important thing is that we can review
>> the stuff in the ordinary course of business, which the charter
>> already sets up provisions for.
>>
>> I think ARIA should look at the HTML Accessibility API Mappings, and
>> in particular take a position on whether that should continue to be a
>> joint deliverable between Web Platform and ARIA, or just become a sole
>> deliverable of ARIA. It should also look at whether the necessary
>> deliverables and coordinations are expressed to ensure ARIA works in
>> HTML. There may be other deliverables that relate to ARIA work as well.
>>
>> Philippe asks that comments be filed via GitHub:
>>
>> https://github.com/w3c/charter-html/issues/
>>
>> But it might be best if I aggregate any WG feedback rather than get a
>> bunch of people filing issues. I'm not sure there will be feedback,
>> but thought it was important that these groups have the opportunity to
>> review.
>>
>> Michael
>>
>>
>
Received on Thursday, 11 August 2016 08:57:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:23:01 UTC