Re: Call for Adoption: Use Cases Proposal / May 27th Meeting Cancelled

I think the current plan would be to adopt the existing doc as is, without
any capabilities merged into the document. Then once it is a CG work item,
we can work through capabilities as they are brought up and merge them into
the work item as the CG reviews them.

Given that the capabilities people think will be useful is likely to be
contentious, both in the capabilities themselves and what use cases they
cover, and that process might be drawn out, trying to nail down all that
before adopting this item probably would stall out.

On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 11:05 AM Sam Jackson <sam.jackson@socure.me> wrote:

> Thank you Steven. Is the goal also to complete the 'capabilities'
> assessment ahead of the next meeting or is that out of scope? You probably
> saw that Philip Pfeiffenberger has opened an issue to start compiling
> capabilities.
>
> It seems to me that we should reach agreement on which use cases will be
> supported, align those with high-value capabilities, and then map proposals
> to the use cases.
>
> During the last meeting, it seemed like 'capabilities' for use cases may
> be contentious. I recall that concerns were raised about whether certain
> capabilities should be considered widespread or high value. If we want to
> reach consensus on this topic, then it may be appropriate to hear from
> industry participants in addition to the service providers, who have tended
> to be broadly represented on prior calls.
>
> I propose that we focus the next meeting on an assessment of use cases and
> capabilities, and invite some industry participants to share their views. I
> have spoken to a number of people at financial institutions who have
> expressed interest in the proceedings of this group but who haven't had the
> bandwidth to attend on an ongoing basis. We could ask them (and others) to
> opine on which specific capabilities have provided the most value for
> stopping fraud.
>
> Best,
> Sam
>
> On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 10:11 AM Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> The chairs are restarting the adoption process for the Use Cases Proposal:
>>
>> https://github.com/antifraudcg/proposals/blob/main/use-cases/use-cases.md
>>
>> Please respond with any further feedback or support for the document in
>> the next week or so (try to get your feedback in by May 27th), and the
>> chairs will determine whether there is sufficient support for the document
>> to adopt it as an official CG work item to iterate on and update as an
>> official CG item.
>>
>> ---
>>
>> Additionally after discussion amongst the chairs, the next meeting on May
>> 27th has been cancelled due to the holidays, the next meeting is scheduled
>> to be June 10th.
>>
>> -Steven
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *This email has been scanned by Inbound Shield™.*
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
>
> *Sam Jackson*
> Vice President, Product
> sam.jackson@socure.com
> M No.  (+1-503-332-0860 <(503)%20332-0860>)
>
> Get rewarded for referring <https://www.socure.com/about/careers> good
> people!  We offer a non-employee referral bonus.
>
> Follow us on: LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/company/socure/>,
> Instagram <https://www.instagram.com/socure.me/?hl=en>, facebook
> <https://www.facebook.com/socure/> and Twitter
> <https://twitter.com/socureme>
>
>
> REAL IDENTITY VERIFICATION <https://www.socure.com/>
>
> NOTE: This email message and any attachments are for the sole use of the
> intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and/or privileged
> information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is
> prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the
> sender by replying to this email, and destroy all copies of the original
> message.
>


-- 

 Steven Valdez |  Chrome Privacy Sandbox |  svaldez@google.com |  Cambridge,
MA