- From: Takeshi Kanai via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 05:38:48 +0000
- To: public-annotation@w3.org
According to [HTML5 spec](https://www.w3.org/TR/html5/grouping-content.html#attr-blockquote-cite), the cite attribute must be a valid URL, then, the IRI based fragment selector (ID) must be converted into URL (Location), strictly speaking. Since "%" in IRI is not a part of reserved character in URL, the letters, such as %20, %3D, %2C, %23, which are percent encoded in the selector mapping process must be re-encoded and will become %2520, %253D, %252C, %2523, respectively. I don't think it is necessary to modify the examples, they are valid URLs fortunately, but I think the process of IRI to URL conversion should be mentioned in the section. By the way, are there any strong reasons to express the fragment selector as ID? The selector itself is well structured and the selected text, or something, could be identical with another representation of fragment selector (ID). Do we need to tell them apart? -- GitHub Notification of comment by tkanai Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/pull/400#issuecomment-276279772 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 31 January 2017 05:38:55 UTC